Ashker et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 767

Order by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas granting 759 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(njvlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EUREKA DIVISION 11 12 TODD ASHKER, et al., C 09-05796 CW 13 14 15 16 17 18 XXXXXXXXXXX Plaintiffs, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE v. MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF ENJOIN DEFENDANTS FROM CALIFORNIA, et al., RETAINING TWO INMATES Defendants. IN SHU 19 20 21 Under this District’s Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5 and General Order 62, Defendants 22 seek to file under seal an unredacted version of their opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion to enjoin the 23 California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation from retaining two inmates in a Security 24 Housing Unit. The Court has considered Defendants’ motion, the declaration supporting 25 Defendants’ motion for under-seal filing, and all other relevant papers on file. Defendants have 26 established that there are compelling reasons to file the information at issue under seal. 27 Defendants’ request, under the circumstances and as required, is narrowly tailored. Accordingly, 28 the Court grants Defendants’ motion for administrative relief. 1 [Proposed] Order Granting Defs.’ Admin. Mot. File Under Seal (C 09-05796 CW) 1 The Clerk is instructed to file under seal the unredacted version of Defendants’ opposition 2 to Plaintiffs’ motion to enjoin. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 26 Dated: July ___, 2017 6 _______________________________________ The Honorable Nandor J. Vadas United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 SF2012204868 21006566.doc 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [Proposed] Order Granting Defs.’ Admin. Mot. File Under Seal (C 09-05796 CW)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?