Ashker et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
Filing
767
Order by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas granting 759 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(njvlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
EUREKA DIVISION
11
12
TODD ASHKER, et al.,
C 09-05796 CW
13
14
15
16
17
18
XXXXXXXXXXX
Plaintiffs, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
v.
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION
TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF
ENJOIN DEFENDANTS FROM
CALIFORNIA, et al.,
RETAINING TWO INMATES
Defendants. IN SHU
19
20
21
Under this District’s Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5 and General Order 62, Defendants
22
seek to file under seal an unredacted version of their opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion to enjoin the
23
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation from retaining two inmates in a Security
24
Housing Unit. The Court has considered Defendants’ motion, the declaration supporting
25
Defendants’ motion for under-seal filing, and all other relevant papers on file. Defendants have
26
established that there are compelling reasons to file the information at issue under seal.
27
Defendants’ request, under the circumstances and as required, is narrowly tailored. Accordingly,
28
the Court grants Defendants’ motion for administrative relief.
1
[Proposed] Order Granting Defs.’ Admin. Mot. File Under Seal (C 09-05796 CW)
1
The Clerk is instructed to file under seal the unredacted version of Defendants’ opposition
2
to Plaintiffs’ motion to enjoin.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
26
Dated: July ___, 2017
6
_______________________________________
The Honorable Nandor J. Vadas
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
SF2012204868
21006566.doc
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[Proposed] Order Granting Defs.’ Admin. Mot. File Under Seal (C 09-05796 CW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?