Ashker et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
Filing
920
Order by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman granting 898 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(rmilc1s, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
OAKLAND DIVISION
TODD ASHKER, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
v.
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, et al.,
Case No.: 4:09-cv-05796-CW
CLASS ACTION
ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
The Court has received Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, and the
Declaration of Carmen Bremer in support of the same. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(a),
Plaintiffs have shown that the portions of the documents to be sealed are entitled to protection
under the law because they contain confidential information that Defendants claim could harm
CDCR institutional safety and security if disclosed. See Dugan v. Lloyds TSB Bank, PLC, No.
12-cv-02549-WHA (NJV), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51162, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2013)
(finding that good cause may exist to seal records “if disclosure of the information might harm
a litigant’s competitive standing”). Plaintiffs have met the “good cause” standard for sealing
portions of Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend the Settlement Agreement, portions of the Declarations
of Rachel Meeropol, Samuel Miller, and Carmen Bremer in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion to
28
[
CASE NO. 4:09-CV-05796-CW
1
Extend the Settlement Agreement, as well as Exhibits A through RR to such Meeropol
2
declaration, Exhibits 34 through 59 to such Miller declaration, and Exhibits a through o, t, u, w,
3
and y to such Bremer declaration (collectively, the “Confidential Material”), because Plaintiffs
4
have shown that they contain confidential information that Defendants claim would harm
5
institutional safety and security, and would further compromise ongoing investigations of
6
alleged prison gang activity if disclosed. See Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d
7
1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006).1
8
9
10
Having considered Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Under Seal and the
Declaration of Carmen Bremer in support of same, and good cause appearing therefor,
Plaintiffs’ Motion is hereby GRANTED.
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
Nov. 30
Dated: ____________________, 2017
By:
Honorable Robert M. Illman
United States Magistrate Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
To the extent Plaintiffs’ Motion to Extend the Settlement Agreement is properly considered a
dispositive motion within the procedural context of this case, this Court further finds that there are
“compelling reasons” supporting the secrecy of the Confidential Materials. Kamakana, 447 F.3d
at 1180.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION
FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF
2
CASE NO. 4:09-CV-05796-CW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?