Ashker et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
Filing
971
Order by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman granting 953 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(rmilc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
12
TODD ASHKER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
v.
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No.: 4:09-cv-05796-CW
CLASS ACTION
ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
Honorable Robert M. Illman
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING MOTION
FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF
CASE NO. 4:09-CV-05796-CW
1
The Court has received Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, and the
2
Declaration of Carmen E. Bremer in support of the same. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(a),
3
Plaintiffs have shown that the portions of the documents to be sealed are entitled to protection
4
under the law because they contain confidential information that Defendants claim could harm
5
CDCR institutional safety and security if disclosed. See Dugan v. Lloyds TSB Bank, PLC, No.
6
12-cv-02549-WHA (NJV), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51162, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2013)
7
(finding that good cause may exist to seal records “if disclosure of the information might harm
8
a litigant’s competitive standing”). Plaintiffs have met the “good cause” standard for sealing
9
portions of Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of their Motion Regarding Inadequate RCGP
10
Verification Reviews (“Plaintiffs’ Reply”), together with Exhibits A and B to the Declaration of
11
Carmen E. Bremer in support thereof, because Plaintiffs have shown that they contain
12
confidential information that Defendants claim would harm institutional safety and security,
13
and would further compromise ongoing investigations of alleged prison gang activity if
14
disclosed. See Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006).
15
Having considered Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Under Seal and the
16
Declaration of Carmen E. Bremer in support of same, and good cause appearing therefor,
17
Plaintiffs’ Motion is hereby GRANTED.
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
February 13, 2018
Dated: ____________________
By:
Honorable Robert M. Illman
United States Magistrate Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING MOTION
FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF
1
CASE NO. 4:09-CV-05796-CW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?