Ice Cream Distributors of Evansville, LLC v. Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc. et al
Filing
60
ORDER VACATING THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 8, 2010. Signed by Judge Beeler on 8/30/10. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
Oakland Division ICE CREAM DISTRIBUTORS OF EVANSVILLE, LLC, v. Plaintiff, No. C 09-05815 LB ORDER VACATING THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 8, 2010
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DREYER'S GRAND ICE CREAM, INC., et al., Defendants. _____________________________________/
On June 3, 2010, this Court scheduled a settlement conference in this case for September 8, 2010. ECF No. 42. On July 2, 2010, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. ECF No. 47. In light of Defendants' Motion, the parties filed a Stipulation on August 24, 2010 asking the Honorable Claudia Wilken, the presiding judge in this case, to extend the deadline for a settlement conference until the Court had rendered a decision on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 58. On August 26, 2010, Judge Wilken granted the Stipulation and ordered an extension of the deadline for a settlement conference. ECF No. 59. Accordingly, the settlement conference scheduled for September 8, 2010 is hereby VACATED. This Court will contact the parties and schedule a settlement conference in this matter following Judge Wilken's /// ///
C 09-05815
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12
For the Northern District of California
ruling on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 30, 2010 _______________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
C 09-05815
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?