Gardner et al v. Shell Oil Company et al

Filing 104

ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANTS' EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS, Docket Nos. 92 & 96.. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on June 3, 2011. (cwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 DAVID GARDNER; STEVE MATTERN; and WILLIAM SULLIVAN, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated current and former employees, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiffs, v. No. C 09-05876 CW ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANTS' EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS (Docket Nos. 92 & 96) SHELL OIL COMPANY; SHELL OIL PRODUCTS COMPANY, LLC; and EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC dba SHELL OIL PRODUCTS US; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. ________________________________/ 19 On June 2, 2011 Defendants Shell Oil Company, Shell Oil 20 Products Company LLC, and Equilon Enterprises LLC, doing business 21 as Shell Oil Products US, filed two sets of evidentiary objections 22 23 in violation of Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) and this Court's standing 24 order. 25 and this Court's order, the parties shall include any evidentiary 26 objections within any motion for summary judgment, cross-motion 27 28 Docket Nos. 92 & 96. As provided by Rule 7-3(a) and (c) 1 2 for summary judgment, opposition and/or reply. Therefore, Defendants' evidentiary objections are stricken. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: 7 June 3, 2011 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?