Doubt v. NCR Corporation
Filing
17
STIPULATION AND ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 3/15/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2010) Modified on 3/9/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TERRY DOUBT
CASE NO. C09-05917 SBA
Plaintiff( s),
v.
NCR CORPORATION
STIPULA nON AND XXXXXXXX (PROPOSED) ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Defendant( s).
/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and havé reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to paricipate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. '4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
./ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process: Private ADR (please identif process and provider)
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
./ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
other requested deadline
Dated: March 3, 2010
Dated: 0 ~ ~ O~ -(0
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation."
XPROPXXED) ORDER ( XXX OS XX
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: Non-binding Arbitration
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
./ Mediation Private ADR
Deadline for ADR session
./ 90 days from the date ofthis order.
other
IT is SO ORDERED.
Dated: 3/5/10
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT
mDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?