Doubt v. NCR Corporation

Filing 17

STIPULATION AND ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 3/15/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2010) Modified on 3/9/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TERRY DOUBT CASE NO. C09-05917 SBA Plaintiff( s), v. NCR CORPORATION STIPULA nON AND XXXXXXXX (PROPOSED) ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Defendant( s). / Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and havé reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to paricipate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. '4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) ./ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: Private ADR (please identif process and provider) The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: ./ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) other requested deadline Dated: March 3, 2010 Dated: 0 ~ ~ O~ -(0 When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation." XPROPXXED) ORDER ( XXX OS XX Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: Non-binding Arbitration Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) ./ Mediation Private ADR Deadline for ADR session ./ 90 days from the date ofthis order. other IT is SO ORDERED. Dated: 3/5/10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT mDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?