Petroliam Nasional Berhad v. GoDaddy.com, Inc.

Filing 108

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 9/6/2011. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD, 7 8 9 v. No. C 09-5939 PJH ORDER GODADDY.COM, INC., Defendant(s). _______________________________/ 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiff(s), 12 13 14 The court has reviewed the discovery dispute set forth in the parties’ joint letter brief filed September 2, 2011 and rules as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s objection to defendant’s response to plaintiff’s document request no. 15 5 is OVERRULED. The response is adequate for the reasons stated by 16 defendant. 17 2. As it is not clear what additional information plaintiff seeks that has not been 18 provided, the parties are ordered to meet and confer and attempt to resolve it 19 themselves. To the extent that plaintiff seeks in these interrogatories the 20 same information it seeks in document request no. 5, such information need 21 not be produced. 22 3. It is not clear what plaintiff means by its “document production is ongoing.” 23 As the document requests were propounded on June 17, 2011, production is 24 clearly overdue and shall be made no later than September 9, 2011. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Dated: September 6, 2011 28 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?