Petroliam Nasional Berhad v. GoDaddy.com, Inc.
Filing
108
ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 9/6/2011. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2011)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD,
7
8
9
v.
No. C 09-5939 PJH
ORDER
GODADDY.COM, INC.,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiff(s),
12
13
14
The court has reviewed the discovery dispute set forth in the parties’ joint letter brief
filed September 2, 2011 and rules as follows:
1.
Plaintiff’s objection to defendant’s response to plaintiff’s document request no.
15
5 is OVERRULED. The response is adequate for the reasons stated by
16
defendant.
17
2.
As it is not clear what additional information plaintiff seeks that has not been
18
provided, the parties are ordered to meet and confer and attempt to resolve it
19
themselves. To the extent that plaintiff seeks in these interrogatories the
20
same information it seeks in document request no. 5, such information need
21
not be produced.
22
3.
It is not clear what plaintiff means by its “document production is ongoing.”
23
As the document requests were propounded on June 17, 2011, production is
24
clearly overdue and shall be made no later than September 9, 2011.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
Dated: September 6, 2011
28
______________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?