Petroliam Nasional Berhad v. GoDaddy.com, Inc.

Filing 128

RESPONSE (re 120 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment NOTICE ONLY: MEMORANDUM AND OTHER DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT FILED UNDER SEAL ) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed byGoDaddy.com, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Slafsky, John) (Filed on 11/16/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

JOHN L. SLAFSKY, State Bar No. 195513
DAVID L. LANSKY, State Bar No. 199952
HOLLIS BETH HIRE, State Bar No. 203651
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant
GODADDY.COM, INC.

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD,

13

Plaintiff,

14

vs.

15

GODADDY.COM, INC.,

16

Defendant.

17
18

GODADDY.COM, INC.,

19
20
21
22

Counterclaimant,
vs.
PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD,
Counterclaim Defendant.

23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No: 09-CV-5939 PJH

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO.: 09-CV-5939 PJH

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1

The Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Petroliam Nasional Berhad (“Petronas”)

2

against GoDaddy.com, Inc. (“Go Daddy”) came on for hearing in the ordinary course. All

3

appearances are noted in the record. Having considered the papers filed in support of and in

4

opposition to said Motion, the argument of counsel, and for good cause shown,

5

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.

6
7

Dated: _________________
Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton
United States District Court Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No: 09-CV-5939 PJH

-2-