Petroliam Nasional Berhad v. GoDaddy.com, Inc.

Filing 157

ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT re 156 Letter filed by GoDaddy.com, Inc. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/22/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

JOHN L. SLAFSKY, State Bar No. 195513
DAVID L. LANSKY, State Bar No. 199952
HOLLIS BETH HIRE, State Bar No. 203651
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

7
8

Attorneys for Defendant
GODADDY.COM, INC.

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD,

13

Plaintiff,

14

vs.

15

GODADDY.COM, INC.,

16

Defendant.

17
18
GODADDY.COM, INC.,
19
Counterclaimant,
20
vs.
21
PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD,
22
Counterclaim Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL ORDER
Case No. 4:09-cv-05939-PJH

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO.: 09-CV-5939 PJH
[PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING
PRETRIAL ORDER
AS MODIFIED

Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton

1

The Court has considered Go Daddy’s submitted letter brief seeking to modify the dates

2

set forth in the Case Management and Pretrial Order entered in the above-captioned litigation on

3

June 1, 2011 (Dkt. 92) (the “Pretrial Order”). In light of the pendency of the parties’ respective

4

motions for summary judgment and consequent uncertainty regarding the scope of the claims to

5

prepare for trial, the Court has determined that good cause exists to modify the remaining dates set

6

forth in the Pretrial Order.

7

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the remaining dates set forth in the Pretrial Order are

8

vacated and will be reset following the Court’s ruling on the parties’ respective motions for
14
summary judgment, with pretrial submissions due no sooner than 30 days after the date of the

14

IT IS S

yllis J.
udge Ph

NO

15

RT

16

___________________________
Phyllis J. HamiltonD
United States ERE Judge
O ORD District

J

ER

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL ORDER
Case No. 4:09-cv-05939-PJH

-1-

n

Hamilto

H

17

R NIA

13

UNIT
ED

12/22/11
Dated: ___________________

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

12

S

11

FO

Court’s Order.

LI

10

A

9

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C