Petroliam Nasional Berhad v. GoDaddy.com, Inc.
Filing
17
Filed in Error. Please see document 19 for corrected entry.Certificate of Interested Entities by Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Forney, Sarah) (Filed on 12/22/2009) Modified on 12/22/2009 (vlk, COURT STAFF).
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Perry R. Clark (SBN 197101) Zhuanjia Gu (SBN 244863) perry.clark@kirkland.com zhuanjia.gu@kirkland.com KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 859-7000 Facsimile: (650) 859-7500 Sarah L Forney (SBN 254769) sarah.forney@kirkland.com KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 555 California Street San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 439-1400 Facsimile: (415) 439-1500 Attorneys for Petroliam Nasional Berhad UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Petroliam Nasional Berhad, Plaintiff, vs. GoDaddy.com, Inc., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE NO. 09-CV-05939-PJH PLAINTIFF'S DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-16, the undersigned certifies that the following persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations (including parent corporations), or other entities have either (i) a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding; or (ii) any other kind of interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding: 1. Petroliam Nasional Berhad (PETRONAS) 2. The Government of Malaysia
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DATED: December 22, 2009
Respectfully submitted, /s/ Perry R. Clark Perry R. Clark Zhuanjia Gu Kirkland & Ellis LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 859-7000 Facsimile: (650) 859-7500 Sarah L Forney Kirkland & Ellis LLP 555 California Street San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 439-1400 Facsimile: (415) 439-1500 Attorneys for Plaintiff
2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Perry R. Clark Print Name
PROOF OF SERVICE I, Perry R. Clark, am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 555 California Street, San Francisco, California 94104. On December 22, 2009, I served [copy/original] of the following document(s) described as: PLAINTIFF'S CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS on the interested parties in this action as follows: By Facsimile By transmitting via facsimile, the document(s) listed above to the fax number set forth below on this date before 5:00 p.m. I am aware that service is presumed invalid unless the transmission machine properly issues a transmission report stating the transmission is complete and without error. By U.S. Mail By placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at San Francisco, California, to the addressee(s) set forth below. I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be deposited with the U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at San Francisco, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing. By Overnight Mail By causing the document(s) listed above to be delivered to the addressee(s) set forth below on the following business morning by Federal Express Corporation or Express Mail. By Personal or Messenger Service By causing the document(s) listed above to be personally served in such envelope by hand to the person at the address(s) set forth below: See Attached Service List I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on December 22, 2009, at San Francisco, California.
1
K&E 16103414.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?