Petroliam Nasional Berhad v. GoDaddy.com, Inc.

Filing 172

ORDER GRANTING GODADDY'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL by Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton granting 149 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

JOHN L. SLAFSKY, State Bar No. 195513
DAVID L. LANSKY, State Bar No. 199952
HOLLIS BETH HIRE, State Bar No. 203651
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

7
8

Attorneys for Defendant
GODADDY.COM, INC.

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD,

13

Plaintiff,

14

vs.

15

GODADDY.COM, INC.,

16

Defendant.

17
18
GODADDY.COM, INC.,
19
Counterclaimant,
20
vs.
21
PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD,
22
Counterclaim Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL
Case No. 4:09-cv-05939-PJH

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO.: 09-CV-5939 PJH
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
GO DADDY’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO SEAL

Date:
Time:
Courtroom:

December 7, 2011
9:00 a.m.
3

Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton

1

The Court has considered the papers and evidence presented in connection with Go

2

Daddy’s Administrative Motion to Seal (“Motion to Seal”) filed in response to the November 24,

3

2011 Declaration of Perry Clark In Support of Plaintiff Petronas’s Motion for Partial Summary

4

Judgment on Go Daddy’s Liability for Contributory Cybersquatting (“Clark MPSJ Declaration”)

5

and the November 25, 2011 Declaration of Perry Clark In Support of Plaintiff Petronas’s

6

Opposition to Go Daddy’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Clark Opposition Declaration”). The

7

Court has determined that, in light of the declarations of Nima Kelly and Greg Schwimer filed by

8

Go Daddy In Support of Plaintiff’s Administrative Motion to Seal (see Dkt. No. 124), compelling

9

reasons exist for sealing (1) Go Daddy’s standard operating procedure for dealing with trademark

10

claims (“SOP”), which constitutes Exhibit 24 to the Clark MPSJ Declaration and (2) portions of

11

the transcript of the October 19, 2011 deposition of Jeff Munson found on page 11 at lines 4-10

12

and 14-16, page 13 at lines 9-13, page 14 at lines 7-24, page 16 at lines 1-25, page 17 at lines 1-4,

13

page 19 at lines 6-9 and 22-24, page 22 at lines 6-8, page 23 at lines 3-7and 17-25, and all of

14

pages 24-26 (the “Munson Excerpts”), which are located within pages 187-190 of Exhibit 26 to

15

the Clark MPSJ Declaration, and within pages 82-85 of Exhibit 6 to the Clark Opposition

16

Declaration.

17

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. This Court finds that

18

compelling reasons exist for sealing (1) the SOP, which constitutes Exhibit 24 to the Clark

19

Declaration and (2) the Munson Excerpts, which are located within pages 187-190 of Exhibit 26 to

20

the Clark Declaration, and within pages 82-85 of Exhibit 6 to the Clark Opposition Declaration.

21

Plaintiff is hereby instructed, consistent with this Order, to e-file the public versions of (1) Exhibit

22

24 to the Clark MPSJ Declaration, attached hereto as Exhibit A; (2) Exhibit 26 to the Clark MPSJ

23

Declaration, attached hereto as Exhibit B; and (3) Exhibit 6 to the Clark Opposition Declaration,

24

attached hereto as Exhibit C. The SOP and Munson Excerpts are ordered sealed.

25
S

2/9/12
Dated: ___________________

A

H

ER

amilton

H
hyllis J.

LI

RT

-1-

Judge P

FO

NO

28

R NIA

UNIT
ED

___________________________
Phyllis J. HamiltonERED
O ORD
IT IS S
United States District Judge

27

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL
Case No. 4:09-cv-05939-PJH

RT
U
O

26

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C