Petroliam Nasional Berhad v. GoDaddy.com, Inc.

Filing 32

Proposed Order re 31 MOTION Order Relating Cases and Stipulation by Petroliam Nasional Berhad. (Clark, Perry) (Filed on 3/24/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Perry R. Clark, Esq. Law Offices of Perry R. Clark 1245 Hamilton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94301 Telephone: (650) 248-5817 Facsimile: (650) 248-5816 perry@perryclarklaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD, ) CASE NO: 09-CV-5939 PJH ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) GODADDY.COM, INC., ) [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ) ORDER RELATING THIS ACTION Defendant. ) (09-CV-5939 PJH) WITH LATER ) FILED ACTION 10-CV-00431 EMC ) ) [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER Case No: 09-CV-5939 PJH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-12(a) and for the reasons set forth Plaintiff Petronas's Administrative Motion for Order Relating Case, the Parties stipulate that this action (Case No. 09-CV-5939 PJH) and the later filed action (Case No. 10-CV-00431 EMC) concern substantially the same parties and property and should, therefore, be deemed related cases. Dated: March 24, 2010 LAW OFFICES OF PERRY R. CLARK By: /s/ Perry R. Clark Perry R. Clark . Attorney for Plaintiff PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD Dated: March 24, 2010 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation By: /s/ John L. Slafsky John L. Slafsky David E. Kramer Hollis Beth Hire . Attorneys for GODADDY.COM, INC. SIGNATURE ATTESTATION I, Perry R. Clark, hereby attest that all signatories to this document have consented to the e-filing of this document. Dated: March 24, 2010 By: /s/ John L. Slafsky John L. Slafsky PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED Date: _______________ _______________________________ Hon. Phlyllis J. Hamilton U.S. District Judge -2[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER Case No: 09-CV-5939 PJH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?