Petroliam Nasional Berhad v. GoDaddy.com, Inc.

Filing 56

Proposed Order Granting 55 Motion to Strike GoDaddy's Affirmative Defenses by Petroliam Nasional Berhad. (Clark, Perry) (Filed on 8/25/2010) Modified on 8/26/2010 (vlk, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Petroliam Nasional Berhad v. GoDaddy.com, Inc. Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 PERRY R. CLARK, State Bar No. 197101 Law Offices of Perry R. Clark 3457 Cowper St. Palo Alto, CA 94306 Telephone: (650) 248-5817 Facsimile: (650) 618 8533 perry@perryclarklaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD (PETRONAS) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD, Plaintiff, vs. GODADDY.COM, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 09-CV-5939 PJH [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES OF GODADDY Date: September 29, 2010 Time: 9:00 a.m. Courtroom 3 Judge: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES OF GODADDY Case No: 09-CV-5939 PJH Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 The undersigned has read the papers filed by the parties and considered the argument of counsel in connection with Plaintiff's motion to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) all of Defendant's affirmative defenses in its complaint (Docket No. 27). In light of the foregoing and for good cause appearing therefore, the Court hereby GRANTS the plaintiff's motion and defendant's First through Eighth Affirmative Defenses are hereby STRICKEN. Dated: _____________, 2010 Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton United States District Judge -2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES OF GODADDY Case No: 09-CV-5939 PJH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 -3[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES OF GODADDY Case No: 09-CV-5939 PJH Ex. A

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?