Petroliam Nasional Berhad v. GoDaddy.com, Inc.

Filing 64

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-3 TO POSTPONE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE CERTAIN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton granting 60 Motion (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2010)

Petroliam Nasional Berhad v. GoDaddy.com, Inc.

Doc. 64

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

JOHN L. SLAFSKY, State Bar No. 195513 DAVID H. KRAMER, State Bar No. 168452 HOLLIS BETH HIRE, State Bar No. 203651 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant GoDaddy.com, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE NO.: 09-CV-5939 PJH [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-3 TO POSTPONE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE CERTAIN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES JUDGE: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton

Petroliam Nasional Berhad, Plaintiff, vs. GoDaddy.com, Inc., Defendant.

Upon Defendant GoDaddy.com, Inc.'s Motion Pursuant to Local Rule 6-3 to Postpone Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Certain Affirmative Defenses, and in consideration of Plaintiff's Opposition and the supporting declarations and exhibits filed in connection with the briefing on this Motion, and good cause appearing therefore; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Defendant GoDaddy.com, Inc.'s Motion Pursuant to Local Rule 6-3 to Postpone Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Certain Affirmative Defenses is GRANTED. The hearing date for Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Certain Affirmative Defenses, filed August 25, 2010, shall be
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO POSTPONE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE CERTAIN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Case No: 09-CV-5939 PJH
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

postponed to this Court's first available hearing date at least 5 weeks following a decision on the pending Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and for an Order Finding Plaintiff Liable for Attorneys' Fees. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, Defendant shall file an opposition to the Motion to Strike not less than 21 days before the revised hearing date, and Plaintiff shall file a reply not less than 14 days before the revised hearing date. The parties are directed to the Ninth Circuit's recent decision in Whittlestone v. Handi-Craft Co., 2010 WL 3222417 (9th Cir., Aug. 17, 2010).

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO POSTPONE HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE CERTAIN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Case No: 09-CV-5939 PJH

UNIT ED

S

8

9/7/10 Dated: _________________

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

-2-

A

C

LI

FO

Judge P

hyllis J.

Hamilto

n

R NIA

T C __________________________________ TA The Hon. Phyllis RED J. Hamilton RDE T IS SO United IStatesODistrict Judge

ISTRIC ES D T

RT U O

NO

RT

H