Rose et al v. Stephens Institute

Filing 107

ORDER by Judge Joseph C. Spero re: 91 Motion for Discovery (jcslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 9 SCOTT ROSE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STEPHENS INSTITUTE, Defendant. 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Case No. 09-cv-05966-PJH (JCS) ORDER RE MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF DEFENDANT’S WAIVER OF ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE Re: Dkt. No. 91 Relators Scott Rose, et al. (“Relators”) brought a motion for a determination of Defendant 13 Stephens Institute’s (“Defendant’s”) waiver of privilege following multiple disclosures of 14 attorney-client privileged and attorney work-product protected documents during production of 15 electronically stored information. The matter was heard on September 5, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. Good 16 cause appearing, and for the reasons stated on the record, the Court rules as follows: 17 18 19 With regard to all documents produced by Defendant to Relators by the date of the hearing, September 5, 2014: 1. As to any documents that have been identified by Defendant to Relators on or 20 before the date of the hearing as protected by the attorney-client privilege or as attorney work- 21 product, but inadvertently produced, the Court finds that production of these documents does not 22 operate as a waiver of attorney-client privilege or attorney work-product protection pursuant to 23 Rule 502(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. 24 2. As to any documents that have not been identified by Defendant to Relators on or 25 before the date of the hearing as protected by the attorney-client privilege or as attorney work- 26 product, but inadvertently produced, the Court finds that any privilege or work-product protection 27 has been waived (as agreed to by counsel for Defendants). 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 2 3 Dated: September 5, 2014 ______________________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO United States Magistrate Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?