Rose et al v. Stephens Institute

Filing 147

ORDER denying relief sought by non-party. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 11/3/2015. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES D
DISTRICT C
COURT

5

NORTHER DISTRIC OF CAL
N
RN
CT
LIFORNIA

6
7

SCOTT ROS et al.,
SE,

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 09-cv-5966
6-PJH

Plaintiffs,

8
v.

ORDER D
DENYING R
RELIEF SO
OUGHT
BY NON-P
PARTY

STEPHENS INSTITUTE,
Defendant.

12
13
14

The co is in rec
ourt
ceipt of the “notice of u
unresolved state claim and obje
ms
ection to

15

any settlemen or propos settlem
nt
sed
ment, and pr
roposal of lien in equit on any aw
ty
ward or

16

set
ttlement to Scott Rose and Mary Aquino,” filled on Octo
e
ober 29, 20 by non-party Tina
015

17

Ma Vandeleur Leigh. The movan makes th
arie
nt
hree reques of the co
sts
ourt: (1) “o
order both

18

parties to awa the resolution of [he claims . . . before d
ait
er]
distributing any award or

19

set
ttlement fro defenda
om
ant,” (2) “fac
cilitate the s
speedy reso
olution of [h claims by ordering
her]
g

20

both parties to fully share any and all discover that has a
o
e
a
ry
already tak place,” and (3) if it
ken

21

is necessary for her to become a pa to this suit, “allow [her] suffic
n
f
arty
w
cient opport
tunity to

22

find counsel.” See Dkt. 146.
d

23
24
25
26
27
28

Becaus the mov
se
vant is not a party to th suit, the court finds that she la
his
s
acks
sta
anding to ob
btain the three forms of relief sou
o
ught, and th DENIES the reque
hus
S
est.
IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: November 3, 2015
__
__________
__________
__________
_______
PH
HYLLIS J. H
HAMILTON
Un
nited States District Ju
s
udge