Rose et al v. Stephens Institute
Filing
183
ORDER granting request to stay proceedings. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 06/01/2016. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
SCOTT ROSE, et al.,
9
v.
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO
STAY PROCEDDINGS
10
STEPHENS INSTITUTE,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 09-cv-05966-PJH
Plaintiffs,
8
Defendant.
12
13
14
15
On May 23, 2016, via letter, counsel for the defendant Academy of Art University
16
requested to stay proceedings in this case “pending the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in
17
Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar, 780 F.3d 504 (1st Cir. 2015),
18
cert. granted, No. 15-7 (U.S. July 1, 2015).”
19
The court’s May 4, 2016 order held that the plaintiff relators’ claims were limited to
20
an “implied false certification theory.” Dkt 179, p.12. The Supreme Court granted
21
certiorari in Escobar to decide whether the “‘implied certification’ theory of legal falsity
22
under the FCA . . . is viable.” Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Escobar (No. 15-7). A
23
decision in Escobar is expected this month, and could potentially greatly impact the
24
remaining claims in this case.
25
No objection or other response has been submitted by plaintiffs.
26
Accordingly, good cause appearing, the court orders that the case is STAYED until
27
the Supreme Court issues its decision in Escobar. The case management conference
28
scheduled for June 2, 2016 is taken off calendar and will be rescheduled at a later date.
1
Defense counsel shall notify the court immediately upon learning of a decision in
2
Escobar.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 1, 2016.
5
6
7
__________________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?