Rose et al v. Stephens Institute

Filing 183

ORDER granting request to stay proceedings. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 06/01/2016. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SCOTT ROSE, et al., 9 v. ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO STAY PROCEDDINGS 10 STEPHENS INSTITUTE, 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 09-cv-05966-PJH Plaintiffs, 8 Defendant. 12 13 14 15 On May 23, 2016, via letter, counsel for the defendant Academy of Art University 16 requested to stay proceedings in this case “pending the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in 17 Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar, 780 F.3d 504 (1st Cir. 2015), 18 cert. granted, No. 15-7 (U.S. July 1, 2015).” 19 The court’s May 4, 2016 order held that the plaintiff relators’ claims were limited to 20 an “implied false certification theory.” Dkt 179, p.12. The Supreme Court granted 21 certiorari in Escobar to decide whether the “‘implied certification’ theory of legal falsity 22 under the FCA . . . is viable.” Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Escobar (No. 15-7). A 23 decision in Escobar is expected this month, and could potentially greatly impact the 24 remaining claims in this case. 25 No objection or other response has been submitted by plaintiffs. 26 Accordingly, good cause appearing, the court orders that the case is STAYED until 27 the Supreme Court issues its decision in Escobar. The case management conference 28 scheduled for June 2, 2016 is taken off calendar and will be rescheduled at a later date. 1 Defense counsel shall notify the court immediately upon learning of a decision in 2 Escobar. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 1, 2016. 5 6 7 __________________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?