Rose et al v. Stephens Institute
Filing
26
SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER re 25 Stipulation filed by Stephens Institute. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/21/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel.
)
SEAN ROSE, MARY AQUINO, MITCHELL )
NELSON AND LUCY STEARNS,
)
)
Plaintiff-Relators,
)
)
vs.
)
)
STEPHENS INSTITUTE, a California
)
corporation, doing business as ACADEMY
)
OF ART UNIVERSITY and DOES 1 through )
50, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants,
)
)
)
Case No.: C-09-5966 PJH
ORDER (PROPOSED).
Pursuant to stipulation, and the accompanying Declaration, it is SO
22
23
ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER (PROPOSED) EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT STEVENS
INSTITUTE TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO AMENDED COMPLAINT - 1
1
The Clerk shall provide counsel with notice of this Order.
2
3
December 21
Dated this _________________, 2011.
4
RT
U
O
NO
RT
ER
n
Hamilto
A
H
8
hyllis J.
Judge P
R NIA
7
LI
6
FO
S
________________________
D
RDERE
Phyllis O OHamilton
IT IS S J.
U.S. District Court Judge
UNIT
ED
5
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER (PROPOSED) EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT STEVENS
INSTITUTE TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO AMENDED COMPLAINT - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?