Rose et al v. Stephens Institute

Filing 26

SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER re 25 Stipulation filed by Stephens Institute. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/21/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. ) SEAN ROSE, MARY AQUINO, MITCHELL ) NELSON AND LUCY STEARNS, ) ) Plaintiff-Relators, ) ) vs. ) ) STEPHENS INSTITUTE, a California ) corporation, doing business as ACADEMY ) OF ART UNIVERSITY and DOES 1 through ) 50, inclusive, ) ) Defendants, ) ) ) Case No.: C-09-5966 PJH ORDER (PROPOSED). Pursuant to stipulation, and the accompanying Declaration, it is SO 22 23 ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER (PROPOSED) EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT STEVENS INSTITUTE TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO AMENDED COMPLAINT - 1 1 The Clerk shall provide counsel with notice of this Order. 2 3 December 21 Dated this _________________, 2011. 4 RT U O NO RT ER n Hamilto A H 8 hyllis J. Judge P R NIA 7 LI 6 FO S ________________________ D RDERE Phyllis O OHamilton IT IS S J. U.S. District Court Judge UNIT ED 5 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER (PROPOSED) EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT STEVENS INSTITUTE TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO AMENDED COMPLAINT - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?