Rose et al v. Stephens Institute

Filing 281

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FRCP 41 AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/8/2021. (kc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2021)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 THE JAFFE LAW FIRM Stephen R. Jaffe (CA SBN 49539) 101 California Street, Ste. 2710 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 618-0100 Facsimile: (415) 618-0080 Email: Stephen.R.Jaffe@JaffeTrialLaw.com GOMBOS LEYTON, P.C. Steven M. Gombos (VA SBN 30788) (admitted pro hac vice; lead counsel) 11350 Random Hills Road, Suite 400 Fairfax, Virginia 22030 Telephone: (703) 934-2660 Facsimile: (703) 934-9840 Email: SGombos@glpclaw.com WAGSTAFFE, VON LOEWENFELDT, BUSCH & RADWICK LLP JAMES M. WAGSTAFFE (95535) wagstaffe@wvbrlaw.com MICHAEL VON LOEWENFELDT (178665) mvl@wvbrlaw.com 100 Pine Street, Suite 2250 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 357-8900 Fax: (415) 357-8910 LAW OFFICES OF LELAND B. ALTSCHULER Leland B. Altschuler (CA SBN 81459) 2995 Woodside Road, Suite 350 Woodside, CA 94062 Telephone: (650) 328-7917 Facsimile: (650) 989-4200 Email: Lee@AltschulerLaw.com Attorneys for Relators Scott Rose, Mary Aquino, Mitchell Nelson, and Lucy Stearns ATTORNEYS FOR: Defendant Stephens Institute d/b/a Academy of Art University 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 19 OAKLAND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. SCOTT ROSE, MARY AQUINO, MITCHELL NELSON AND LUCY STEARNS, Plaintiffs/Relators, 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case No. 4:09-cv-05966-PJH STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FRCP 41 AND ORDER v. STEPHENS INSTITUTE, a California corporation, doing business as ACADEMY OF ART UNIVERSITY, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Judge: Location: Hon. Phyllis Hamilton Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor Defendants. 26 27 28 Case No. 4:09-cv-05966-PJH-JCS STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD: 2 The parties have entered into a settlement agreement resolving all claims in this action. 3 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), and in accordance with and subject to the 4 terms of the settlement agreement, the parties stipulate that this action be dismissed with 5 prejudice. The Parties intend this dismissal to constitute a full and final judgment in this action. 6 7 8 9 10 11 The Parties have been informed that counsel for the United States of America will be filing a consent to this dismissal. The parties further stipulate that this Court should retain jurisdiction exclusively to enforce the settlement agreement. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: November 5, 2021 12 _/s/ Stephen Jaffe_________________ By: Stephen Jaffe 13 14 15 THE JAFFE LAW FIRM Dated: November 5, 2021 16 WAGSTAFFE, VON LOEWENFELDT, BUSCH & RADWICK LLP _/s/ James Wagstaffe______________ By: James Wagstaffe 17 Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Relators Scott Rose, Mary Aquino, Mitchell Nelson, and Lucy Stearns 18 19 20 21 Dated: November 5, 2021 22 GOMBOS LEYTON, P.C. /s/ Steven M. Gombos By: Steven M. Gombos (admitted pro hac vice) 23 24 25 Attorneys for Defendant Stephens Institute d/b/a Academy of Art University 26 27 28 Case No. 4:09-cv-05966-PJH-JCS -2- STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 2 I hereby attest that all signatories listed above, on whose behalf this stipulation is 3 submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing. 4 Dated: November 5, 2021 6 WAGSTAFFE, VON LOEWENFELDT, BUSCH & RADWICK LLP /s/ James Wagstaffe By: James Wagstaffe 7 8 Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Relators Scott Rose, Mary Aquino, Mitchell Nelson, and Lucy Stearns 11 S 14 DERED O OR IT IS S 15 NO 16 RT ER H 17 J 18 19 yllis J. udge Ph n Hamilto November 8, 2021 N D IS T IC T R R NIA UNIT ED 13 RT U O 12 S DISTRICT TE C TA FO 10 LI 9 A 5 OF C 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 4:09-cv-05966-PJH-JCS -3- STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?