Rose et al v. Stephens Institute

Filing 38

ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO CONTINUE DATES re 37 Stipulation filed by Mitchell Nelson, Scott Rose, Lucy Stearns, Mary Aquino. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/20/12. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

THE JAFFE LAW FIRM
Stephen R. Jaffe (CA SBN 49539)
101 California Street, Suite 2450
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415 618-0080
Email: [e-mail]

RITZERT & LEYTON, P.C.
Steven M. Gombos (VA SBN 30788)
(admitted pro hac vice; lead counsel)
11350 Random Hills Road, Suite 400
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Martha Boersch (State Bar No. 126569)
[e-mail]
MARTHA BOERSCH, ATTORNEY AT LAW
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 1070
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]

LAW OFFICES OF LELAND B. ALTSCHULER
Leland B. Altschuler (CA SBN 81459)
2995 Woodside Road, Suite 350
Woodside, CA 94062
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

COUNSEL FOR: Relators Scott Rose, Mary
Aquino, Mitchell Nelson and Lucy Stearns

COUNSEL FOR: Defendant Stephens Institute,
d/b/a Academy of Art University

10
11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

OAKLAND DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel.
SCOTT ROSE, MARY AQUINO, MITCHELL
NELSON AND LUCY STEARNS,
Plaintiffs/Relators,
vs.

Case No. C-09-5966 PJH
ORDER DENYING

JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME AND CONTINUANCE OF
HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

STEPHENS INSTITUTE, a California
corporation, doing business as ACADEMY OF
ART UNIVERSITY and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,
Defendants.
Plaintiffs/Relators United States of America, ex rel., Scott Rose, Mary Aquino, Mitchell

25

Nelson, and Lucy Stearns (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Stephens Institute d/b/a

26

Academy of Art University (“Defendant”) and certain Doe defendants (one through fifty), hereby

27

stipulate and agree as follows:

28

1

STIP. FOR EXT. OF TIME
Case No.: C-09-5966 PJH

Respectfully submitted,

7

RITZERT & LEYTON, P.C.

8

12
13
14
15

H

11

milton

/s/LelandyB.is J. Ha
e Ph ll Altschuler
By: Judg B. Altschuler
Leland
Local Counsel for Defendant
Stephens Institute d/b/a Academy of Art
E R University
C

RT

10

/s/ Steven M. Gombos
By: Steven M. Gombos (admitted pro hac vice)
Lead Counsel for Defendant
Stephens Institute d/b/a Academy of Art
University

LAW OFFICES OF LELAND B.
ALTSCHULER

NO

9

D
DENIE

R NIA

6

FO

3.

ICT
C

S
TE
The Defendant’s Reply shall be due June 22, A
T 2012.

RT
U
O

5

2. The Plaintiffs opposition to the Motion to Dismiss shallISTR on May 23, 2012;
D be due

LI

4

at 9:00 a.m.;

A

3

1. The hearing on the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss shall be continued until July 11, 2012

S

2

UNIT
ED

1

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

THE JAFFE LAW FIRM

LAW OFFICES OF MARTHA A. BOERSCH

/s/Stephen R. Jaffe
By: Stephen R. Jaffe
Counsel for Relators

/s/Martha A. Boersch
By: Martha A. Boersch
Counsel for Relators

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

STIP. FOR EXT. OF TIME
Case No.: C-09-5966 PJH