Rose et al v. Stephens Institute

Filing 41

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS re 39 Stipulation, filed by Mitchell Nelson, Scott Rose, Lucy Stearns, Mary Aquino. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/26/12. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 OAKLAND DIVISION 9 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. SCOTT ROSE, MARY AQUINO, MITCHELL NELSON AND LUCY STEARNS, Case No. C-09-5966 PJH 11 Plaintiffs/Relators, 12 vs. 13 14 15 16 STEPHENS INSTITUTE, a California corporation, doing business as ACADEMY OF ART UNIVERSITY and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. 17 18 19 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS AND HEARING DATE Based on the stipulation of the parties and the Declaration of Martha Boersch, and for good cause shown, 20 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 21 1. 22 23 27, 2012. 24 2. The hearing on the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss shall be continued until June 25 26 The Plaintiffs’ opposition to the Motion to Dismiss shall be due on May 23, 2012. // 27 28 1 1 3. The Defendant’s Reply shall be due June 13, 2012. 2 UNIT ED 4 DERED SO OR ton J. Hamil NO yl Judge Honorable PhyllisPhJ.lisHamilton 7 A H ER LI RT 6 R NIA IT IS ________________________________ FO 5 March 26 DATED: _____________, 2012 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O S 3 N F D IS T IC T O R C 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME Case No.: 4:09-CV-05966-PJH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?