Rose et al v. Stephens Institute
Filing
41
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS re 39 Stipulation, filed by Mitchell Nelson, Scott Rose, Lucy Stearns, Mary Aquino. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/26/12. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
OAKLAND DIVISION
9
10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel.
SCOTT ROSE, MARY AQUINO, MITCHELL
NELSON AND LUCY STEARNS,
Case No. C-09-5966 PJH
11
Plaintiffs/Relators,
12
vs.
13
14
15
16
STEPHENS INSTITUTE, a California
corporation, doing business as ACADEMY OF
ART UNIVERSITY and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,
Defendants.
17
18
19
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO
MOTION TO DISMISS AND HEARING
DATE
Based on the stipulation of the parties and the Declaration of Martha Boersch, and for
good cause shown,
20
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
21
1.
22
23
27, 2012.
24
2.
The hearing on the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss shall be continued until June
25
26
The Plaintiffs’ opposition to the Motion to Dismiss shall be due on May 23,
2012.
//
27
28
1
1
3.
The Defendant’s Reply shall be due June 13, 2012.
2
UNIT
ED
4
DERED
SO OR
ton
J. Hamil
NO
yl
Judge
Honorable PhyllisPhJ.lisHamilton
7
A
H
ER
LI
RT
6
R NIA
IT IS
________________________________
FO
5
March 26
DATED: _____________, 2012
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
S
3
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE
EXTENSION OF TIME
Case No.: 4:09-CV-05966-PJH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?