Pleasance v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.)

Filing 16

ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong GRANTING 14 Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Sun Life must file a responsive pleading by 02/05/10. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 1/25/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2010) Modified on 1/26/2010 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 CARROLL PLEASANCE, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BARGER & WOLEN LLP 633 W. FIFTH ST. FORTY-SEVENTH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 (213) 680-2800 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY ) OF CANADA (U.S.), DOES 1-10, ) INCLUSIVE, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 3:09-cv-06067-SBA Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANT SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA (U.S.)'S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT IN ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF MAY FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT Complaint Filed: November 17, 2009 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANT SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA (U.S.)'S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT IN ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF MAY FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 Based on the stipulation of the parties extending the date for Defendant Sun 2 Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.) ("Sun Life") to respond to Plaintiff's 3 Complaint , and good cause appearing, the date by which Sun Life must file a 4 responsive pleading shall be extended to February 5, 2010. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: January 25, 2010 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BARGER & WOLEN LLP 633 W. FIFTH ST. FORTY-SEVENTH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 (213) 680-2800 By: ___________________ Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong -2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANT SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA (U.S.)'S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT IN ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF MAY FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?