Ross v. Global Wine Company et al

Filing 28

ORDER Granting 27 Protective Order re: Medical Records. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/3/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2011)

Download PDF
Ross v. Global Wine Company et al Doc. 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RICHARD M. ROGERS, #045843 LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD M. ROGERS 100 Bush Street, #1980 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415/981-9788 Facsimile: 415/981-9798 Email: RogersRMR@aol.com KIMBERLEY ROSS Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KIMBERLEY ROSS, Plaintiff, v. GLOBAL WINE COMPANY and JOHN DAVIS, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: CV09-06107 CW [ECF] Case filed: Trial date: 12/31/09 05/31/11 PROTECTIVE ORDER RE MEDICAL RECORDS____________________ USDC NO. CV09-06107 CW [ECF] -- PROTECTIVE ORDER RE MEDICAL RECORDS ROSS /PROT.ORD.docx Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 The parties hereto hereby stipulate that Plaintiff's mental health records will be treated with utmost confidentiality. They will be considered "Attorneys Eyes Only," meaning they will be shown only to the parties' attorneys and medical experts retained by said attorneys. This applies to summaries and other recitations of the contents of the mental health records. This agreement can be modified by the agreement of the parties or by Order of the Court. Respectfully submitted, Dated:_____________________ LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD M. ROGERS By:______________________________________ RICHARD M. ROGERS Attorneys for Plaintiff Dated:_____________________ 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 MANNING & KASS ELLROD, RAMIEREZ, TRESTER By:______________________________________ MADONNA HERMAN Attorneys for Defendants IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3/3/2011 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT USDC NO. CV09-06107 CW [ECF] -- PROTECTIVE ORDER RE MEDICAL RECORDS ROSS /PROT.ORD.docx 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?