Ross v. Global Wine Company et al
Filing
28
ORDER Granting 27 Protective Order re: Medical Records. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/3/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2011)
Ross v. Global Wine Company et al
Doc. 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
RICHARD M. ROGERS, #045843 LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD M. ROGERS
100 Bush Street, #1980 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415/981-9788 Facsimile: 415/981-9798 Email: RogersRMR@aol.com
KIMBERLEY ROSS
Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KIMBERLEY ROSS,
Plaintiff, v.
GLOBAL WINE COMPANY and JOHN DAVIS,
Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No.: CV09-06107 CW [ECF] Case filed: Trial date: 12/31/09 05/31/11
PROTECTIVE ORDER RE MEDICAL RECORDS____________________
USDC NO. CV09-06107 CW [ECF] -- PROTECTIVE ORDER RE MEDICAL RECORDS
ROSS /PROT.ORD.docx
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
The parties hereto hereby stipulate that Plaintiff's mental health records will be treated with utmost confidentiality. They will be considered "Attorneys Eyes Only," meaning they will be shown only to the parties' attorneys and medical experts retained by said attorneys. This applies to summaries and other recitations of the contents of the mental health records. This agreement can be modified by the agreement of the parties or by Order of the Court. Respectfully submitted, Dated:_____________________ LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD M. ROGERS
By:______________________________________
RICHARD M. ROGERS
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Dated:_____________________
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
MANNING & KASS ELLROD, RAMIEREZ, TRESTER
By:______________________________________
MADONNA HERMAN
Attorneys for Defendants
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 3/3/2011
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
By: JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT
USDC NO. CV09-06107 CW [ECF] -- PROTECTIVE ORDER RE MEDICAL RECORDS
ROSS /PROT.ORD.docx
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?