Ross v. Global Wine Company et al

Filing 92

ORDER re 91 Concerning Defendant Global Wine Company's Counsel's Appearance at Final Pretrial Conference. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/24/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Instructions Regarding CourtCall)(cwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 KIMBERLEY ROSS, No. C 09-06107 CW 7 Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 GLOBAL WINE COMPANY and JOHN DAVIS, United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Defendants. 11 ORDER CONCERNING DEFENDANT GLOBAL WINE COMPANY’S COUNSEL’S APPEARANCE AT FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE / 12 13 A final pretrial conference is scheduled to be held today, May 14 24, 2011, at 2:00 p.m. 15 Company’s counsel filed a declaration, stating that she has been 16 ordered to remain within ten to fifteen minutes of the San 17 Francisco County Superior Court until the jury in Froncillo v. 18 Contemporary Services Corporation reaches its verdict. 19 declaration, counsel asks this Court to continue the final pretrial 20 conference in this case to August 9, 2011 or August 16, 2011. 21 Counsel’s request is DENIED. 22 This morning, Defendant Global Wine In her Counsel shall appear at today’s final pretrial conference by 23 telephone via CourtCall. 24 CourtCall pursuant to the instructions attached to this Order. 25 counsel is released by the superior court, she shall proceed to 26 this courtroom and appear in person. 27 either telephonically or in person, will result in the imposition 28 of sanctions. She shall make arrangements with If Counsel’s failure to appear, 1 If he so chooses, counsel for Plaintiff Kimberley Ross may 2 appear telephonically. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: May 24, 2011 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?