Ross v. Global Wine Company et al
Filing
92
ORDER re 91 Concerning Defendant Global Wine Company's Counsel's Appearance at Final Pretrial Conference. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/24/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Instructions Regarding CourtCall)(cwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2011)
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
KIMBERLEY ROSS,
No. C 09-06107 CW
7
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
GLOBAL WINE COMPANY and JOHN DAVIS,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Defendants.
11
ORDER CONCERNING
DEFENDANT GLOBAL
WINE COMPANY’S
COUNSEL’S
APPEARANCE AT
FINAL PRETRIAL
CONFERENCE
/
12
13
A final pretrial conference is scheduled to be held today, May
14
24, 2011, at 2:00 p.m.
15
Company’s counsel filed a declaration, stating that she has been
16
ordered to remain within ten to fifteen minutes of the San
17
Francisco County Superior Court until the jury in Froncillo v.
18
Contemporary Services Corporation reaches its verdict.
19
declaration, counsel asks this Court to continue the final pretrial
20
conference in this case to August 9, 2011 or August 16, 2011.
21
Counsel’s request is DENIED.
22
This morning, Defendant Global Wine
In her
Counsel shall appear at today’s final pretrial conference by
23
telephone via CourtCall.
24
CourtCall pursuant to the instructions attached to this Order.
25
counsel is released by the superior court, she shall proceed to
26
this courtroom and appear in person.
27
either telephonically or in person, will result in the imposition
28
of sanctions.
She shall make arrangements with
If
Counsel’s failure to appear,
1
If he so chooses, counsel for Plaintiff Kimberley Ross may
2
appear telephonically.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: May 24, 2011
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?