Wright v. Carasco et al

Filing 56

(Docket No. 57 in Case No. C 09-4358 CW) ORDER STAYING SCHEDULING OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT AND THE PARTIES TO FILE DOCUMENTS IN C 10-0064 CW. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 11/6/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service, # 2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2012)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1
2

DEMETRIUS AHMED WRIGHT,

No. C 09-4358 CW (PR)

3
ORDER STAYING SCHEDULING OF
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE;
DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT
AND THE PARTIES TO FILE
DOCUMENTS IN C 10-0064 CW

Plaintiff,
4
5
6
7

v.
A. HEDGEPETH, et al.,
Defendants.
_______________________________/

8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

On September 30, 2012, the Court granted in part and denied
in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in this pro se
civil rights action.

The Court referred the case to Magistrate

Judge Nandor Vadas to schedule a settlement conference within onehundred and twenty days, or as soon thereafter as is convenient to

13
the Magistrate Judge’s calendar.

Docket no. 55.

14
Plaintiff currently has pending another pro se civil rights
15
action that the Court referred to Magistrate Judge Vadas for a
16
settlement conference.

See Wright v. Carasco, C 10-0064 CW (PR),

17
Docket no. 43.

Plaintiff, however, refused to attend the

18
scheduled settlement conference, and the Court has requested
19
briefing from the parties on the matter.

Id., Docket no. 53.

20
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Court hereby STAYS all further
21
proceedings in this case, including the scheduling of a settlement
22
conference, until the matter of Plaintiff’s refusal to attend the
23
settlement conference in case C 10-0064 has been resolved.
24
Additionally, in the interest of the efficient resolution of
25
these matters, the Court ORDERS as follows:
26
Plaintiff’s response in C 10-0064 stating whether he will
27
agree to attend a settlement conference in that case also shall
28

1

address whether he will agree to attend a settlement conference in

2

the present case.

3

and serve it on counsel for Defendants in both cases.

4
5
6

Plaintiff shall file his response in both cases

No later than fourteen days from the date Plaintiff files his
response, Defendants shall file a reply in both cases.
The Clerk of the Court shall file a copy of this Order in

7

case number C 10-0064 CW (PR) and provide an electronic copy to

8

Magistrate Judge Vadas.

9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 11/5/2012
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

11
12
13
14

cc: NJV

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2