Wright v. Carasco et al

Filing 76

ORDER Vacating Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 EUREKA DIVISION 8 9 DEMETRIUS AHMED WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 No. 4:10-CV-0064 CW (NJV) 12 R. CARASCO, et al., 13 ORDER VACATING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM Defendants. ___________________________________/ 14 15 The settlement conference previously scheduled in this case has been vacated due to Plaintiff’s 16 hospitalization. (Doc. 75.) Accordingly, the writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum issued on 17 April 4, 2013, for Plaintiff’s appearance at that settlement conference is HEREBY VACATED. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 23, 2013 _____________________________ NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 9 DEMETRIUS AHMED WRIGHT, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 Plaintiff, v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE R. CARASCO, et al., 13 14 No. 10-CV-0064 CW (NJV) Defendants. ___________________________________/ 15 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that on April 23, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy of 16 the attached, by placing said copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) listed below, 17 by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Demetrius Ahmed Wright T65802 California Institute for Men Facility C/Calusa 128 P.O. Box 500 Chino, CA 91708 Litigation Coordinator Michael Gill California Institution for Men PO Box 128 Chino, CA 91708-0128 (also by fax) Dated: April 23, 2013 26 27 ____________________________________ 28 Linn Van Meter Administrative Law Clerk to the Honorable Nandor J. Vadas 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?