Wright v. Carasco et al
Filing
76
ORDER Vacating Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
EUREKA DIVISION
8
9
DEMETRIUS AHMED WRIGHT,
Plaintiff,
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. 4:10-CV-0064 CW (NJV)
12
R. CARASCO, et al.,
13
ORDER VACATING WRIT OF
HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM
Defendants.
___________________________________/
14
15
The settlement conference previously scheduled in this case has been vacated due to Plaintiff’s
16
hospitalization. (Doc. 75.) Accordingly, the writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum issued on
17
April 4, 2013, for Plaintiff’s appearance at that settlement conference is HEREBY VACATED.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: April 23, 2013
_____________________________
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
EUREKA DIVISION
7
8
9
DEMETRIUS AHMED WRIGHT,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Plaintiff,
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
R. CARASCO, et al.,
13
14
No. 10-CV-0064 CW (NJV)
Defendants.
___________________________________/
15
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that on April 23, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy of
16
the attached, by placing said copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) listed below,
17
by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Demetrius Ahmed Wright
T65802
California Institute for Men
Facility C/Calusa 128
P.O. Box 500
Chino, CA 91708
Litigation Coordinator Michael Gill
California Institution for Men
PO Box 128
Chino, CA 91708-0128
(also by fax)
Dated: April 23, 2013
26
27
____________________________________
28
Linn Van Meter
Administrative Law Clerk to
the Honorable Nandor J. Vadas
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?