Qinetiq Limited v. Oclaro Inc.

Filing 106

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 104 Stipulation, filed by Oclaro Inc., Qinetiq Limited. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/26/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2010)

Download PDF
Qinetiq Limited v. Oclaro Inc. Doc. 106 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Willam S. Coats (State Bar No. 94864) william.coats@kayescholer.com Peter E. Root (State Bar No. 142348) peter.root@kayescholer.com Taryn Lam (State Bar No. 236124) taryn.lam@kayescholer.com KAYE SCHOLER LLP 275 Middlefield Road, Suite 205 Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: (650) 319-4500 Facsimile: (650) 319-4700 James S. Blank (pro hac vice) jblank@kayescholer.com Stephen J. Elliott (pro hac vice) selliott@kayescholer.com KAYE SCHOLER LLP 425 Park Avenue, 8th Floor New York, NY 10022 Telephone: (212) 836-7528 Facscimile: (212) 836-6507 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant QINETIQ LIMITED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION QINETIQ LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. OCLARO INC., Defendant. _________________________________ AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:10-cv-00080-SBA (EMC) STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARTIES' EXCHANGE OF PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS AND EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO PATENT L.R. 4-2 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Case No. 4:10-cv-00080-SBA Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff QinetiQ Limited ("QinetiQ") and Defendant Oclaro Inc. ("Oclaro"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on June 21, 2010, this Court approved and entered a revised case management schedule (Dkt. No. 56) for the parties' compliance with the obligations and deadlines imposed in the Patent Local Rules ("Scheduling Order"); WHEREAS, pursuant to the Scheduling Order and Patent L.R. 4-1, the parties exchanged their proposed terms for claim construction on October 5, 2010; WHEREAS, the Scheduling Order sets October 25, 2010 as the deadline for the parties to exchange their respective preliminary claim constructions and extrinsic evidence pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-2; WHEREAS, Oclaro and QinetiQ have agreed to extend the October 25, 2010 deadline by one day to October 26, 2010; WHEREAS, the proposed extension until October 26, 2010 is consistent with Patent L.R. 4-2(a), which provides for the exchange of preliminary claim constructions and extrinsic evidence within 21 days after the exchange of the Patent L.R. 4-1 list of proposed terms; WHEREAS, the proposed extension until October 26, 2010 will not alter the date of any event or any other deadline already fixed by Court order: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties shall have up to and including October 26, 2010 to exchange preliminary claim constructions and extrinsic evidence pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-2. Dated: October 22, 2010 KAYE SCHOLER LLP By: /s/ Taryn Lam Taryn Lam Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant QINETIQ LIMITED 1 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Case No. 4:10-cv-00080-SBA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 22, 2010 COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP By: /s/ Orion Armon Orion Armon (pro hac vice) Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant OCLARO INC. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED: Dated:10/26/10 ____________________________________ The Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong United States District Judge ATTESTATION CLAUSE I, Taryn Lam, hereby attest in accordance with General Order No. 45.X(B) that Orion Armon, counsel for Defendant and Counterclaimant Oclaro Inc., has provided his concurrence with the electronic filing of the foregoing document entitled STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARTIES' EXCHANGE OF PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS AND EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO PATENT L.R. 4-2. Dated: October 22, 2010 By: /s/ Taryn Lam Taryn Lam 2 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Case No. 4:10-cv-00080-SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?