Williams v. Life's Rad et al
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 6/4/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 RUSSELL WILLIAMS, 10 11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Case No: C 10-0086 SBA ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
12 LIFE'S RAD, CAFEPRESS.COM 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Plaintiff Russell Williams has submitted a Motion for Voluntary Dismissal. The Court construes this request to be request for dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(B). Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the instant action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs, except as otherwise provided for in their settlement agreement. The Clerk shall close the file and terminate all pending matters. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 4, 2010 ______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WILLIAMS et al, Plaintiff, v. CARRILLO et al, Defendant. / Case Number: CV10-00086 SBA CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on June 4, 2010, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Joseph Carrillo 6912 Maury Drive San Diego, CA 92119 Nancy Carrillo 6912 Maury Drive San Diego, CA 92119 Russell Williams P.O. Box 1112 Pacifica, CA 94044 Dated: June 4, 2010 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?