Vigil Rogelio et al v. Con-Way Freight, Inc.

Filing 106

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 728/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

JORGE R. QUEZADA, et al.,

Case No. 10-cv-00100-JSW

Plaintiffs,
8
v.

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND
PRETRIAL MATTERS

9
10

CON-WAY FREIGHT,
Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case

14

Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further

15

ORDERED that:

16

A.

DATES

17

Jury Trial Date: Monday, July 11, 2016, at 8:00 a.m., 8 week estimate

18

Jury Selection: Wednesday, July 6, 2016, at 8:00 a.m.

19

Pretrial Conference: Monday, June 20, 2016, at 2:00 p.m.

20

Hearing on Dispositive Motions: Friday, April 8, 2016, 9:00 a.m.

21

Hearing on Motion to Decertify Class: Friday, April 8, 2016, 9:00 a.m.

22

Last Day for Expert Discovery: January 29, 2016

23

Last Day for Expert Disclosure: January 12, 2016

24

Close of Non-expert Discovery: December 28, 2015

25

B.

DISCOVERY

26

The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to

27

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses

28

pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of non-

1
expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all
2
supplementation has been completed.
3
C.

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

4
By agreement of the parties, this matter is referred for further private mediation, to be
5
completed by October 30, 2015. The parties shall promptly notify the Court whether the case is
6
resolved.
7
D.

PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER

8
No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its
9
own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b)
10
without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties may
12
not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the date of
13
this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to a change
14
in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule that the Court
15
will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are specifically set
16
by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain leave of Court.
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
Dated: July 28, 2015
20
21
22

______________________________________
JEFFREY S. WHITE
United States District Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28

2