SMDK Corp v. Creative Labs, Inc. et al

Filing 221

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT THOMSON, INC. re 220 Stipulation filed by SMDK, Corporation. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/5/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

STEVEN W. RITCHESON, ESQ (SBN 174062) White Field, Inc. 9800 D Topanga Canyon Blvd. #347 Chatsworth, California 91311 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff SMDK Corporation DAVID M. HILL, ESQ. (pro hac vice) Ward & Olivo 380 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10017 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff SMDK Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION SMDK CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation Plaintiff, v. CREATIVE LABS, INC., a California corporation, CREATIVE TECHNOLOGY LTD., a Singapore corporation, COBY ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, a New York corporation, EPSON AMERICA, INC. , a California corporation, SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, a Japan corporation, SEIKO CORPORATION, a Japan corporation, TIC COMPUTER, INC., D/B/A WOLVERINE DATA, a California corporation, VOSONIC TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, a Taiwan corporation, PHISON CORPORATION, a Taiwan corporation, THOMSON, D/B/A RCA BY THOMSON, a France corporation, AUDIOVOX CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendants. Case No. 10-cv-00116 PJH STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT THOMSON, INC.

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT THOMSON, INC. Case No. 10-cv-00116 PJH

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1

The Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows: 1. Pursuant to Rule 41 of the FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, SMDK

Corporation's claims against THOMSON, INC. shall be dismissed with prejudice and THOMSON, INC.'s claims and counterclaims against SMDK Corporation shall be dismissed without prejudice and; 2. Each party to this action shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

SO STIPULATED. DATED: November 1, 2010 WHITE FIELD, INC. By: /s/ Steven W. Ritcheson STEVEN W. RITCHESON Attorneys for Plaintiff SMDK CORP.

DATED: November 1, 2010

FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI By: /s/ Richard S. Zembek RICHARD S. ZEMBEK (Texas Bar No. 00797726) E. LEE HAAG (Texas Bar No. 08657700) DANIEL S. LEVENTHAL (Texas Bar No. 24050923) FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P. Fulbright Tower 1301 McKinney, Suite 5100 Houston, Texas 77010-3095 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant THOMSON, INC.

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT THOMSON, INC. Case No. 10-cv-00116 PJH

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

ATTESTATION The filer hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories, or from the single signatory (in the case, e.g., of a declaration) which shall serve in lieu of their signature(s) on the document. DATED: November 1, 2010 WHITE FIELD, INC. By: /s/ Steven W. Ritcheson STEVEN W. RITCHESON Attorneys for Plaintiff SMDK CORP.

UNIT ED

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

11/5/10

S

ISTRIC ES D TC AT T

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT THOMSON, INC. Case No. 10-cv-00116 PJH

2

A

C

LI

FO

Judge P

hyllis J.

Hamilto

n

R NIA

IT IS S

O ORD

ERED

RT U O

NO

RT

H