Feuer v. Thompson et al
ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference to 3/12/2012 at 02:00 PM. Proposed Orders on Motions to Dismiss due by 2/15/2012. Joint Proposed Discovery Plan and Joint Scheduling Plan due by 2/27/2012. Motions terminated: 100 MOTION to Appear by Telephone. (ygrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2012)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
J.N. FEUER, Derivatively on Behalf of WELLS
FARGO & COMPANY and its Shareholders and
“Double Derivatively” on Behalf of WACHOVIA
Case No.: C-10-00279 YGR
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
G. KENNEDY THOMPSON et al.,
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,
The Case Management Conference set for February 9, 2012 is CONTINUED to Monday,
March 12, 2012, at 2:00 p.m., at the United States District Court for the Northern District of
California, Ronald V. Dellums Federal Building, Oakland. Personal appearance of lead counsel is
required. Counsel should plan accordingly.
No later than February 15, 2012, each party that filed or opposed a motion to dismiss shall
file a more comprehensive proposed order that sets forth the relief or action sought and a substantive
statement of the rationale of decision, including citation of authority that the party requests the Court
to adopt, and citations to the record evidence, where applicable. A courtesy copy of the proposed
order should be emailed in Word format to: firstname.lastname@example.org.
No later than February 27, 2012, the parties shall file: (i) a joint proposed discovery plan
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f); and (ii) a joint scheduling plan with proposed dates for designation
of experts, discovery cutoff, hearing of dispositive motions, pretrial conference, and trial, and
whether the case will be tried to a jury or to the court and the expected length of the trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 7, 2012
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?