Feuer v. Thompson et al
Filing
143
ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT, Motions terminated: (132 in 4:10-cv-00279-YGR) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses filed by R. A. Feuer, (47 in 4:10-cv-00279-YGR) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by Susan E. Engel, Susan G. Swensen, Judith M. Runstad, Stephen W. Sanger, Enrique Hernandez, Jr., John G Stumpf, Richard D. McCormick, Cynthia H. Mulligan, Philip J. Quigley, Nicholas G. Moore, John Chen, Donald B. Rice, Lloyd H. Dean, (55 in 4:10-cv-00279-YGR) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by G. Kennedy Thompson, Thomas J. Wurtz, Robert K Steel, (20 in 4:12-cv-00203-YGR) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses filed by W. M. Rogers, (50 in 4:10-cv-00279-YGR) MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by John C. Whitaker, Jr., Donald M. James, Ernest S. Rady, Lanty L. Smith, Dona Davis Young, Timothy D. Proctor, John T. Casteen, III, Maryellen C. Herringer, R obert A. Ingram, Ruth G. Shaw, William H. Goodwin, Jr., Jerry Gitt, John D. Baker, II, Peter C. Browning, Van L. Richey, Mackey J. McDonald, Joseph Neubauer, (139 in 4:10-cv-00279-YGR) MOTION for Final Approval of Proposed Settlement filed by R. A. Feuer, (27 in 4:12-cv-00203-YGR) MOTION for Final Approval of Proposed Settlement filed by W. M. Rogers., ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 3/29/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2013)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
GILBERT R. SEROTA (No. 75305)
gilbert.serota@aporter.com
GABRIEL N. WHITE (No. 258257)
gabriel.white@aporter.com
Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4024
Telephone: +1 415.471.3100
Facsimile: +1 415.471.3400
Attorneys for Defendants
JOHN G. STUMPF, PHILIP J. QUIGLEY, JOHN S.
CHEN, LLOYD H. DEAN, SUSAN E. ENGEL,
ENRIQUE HERNANDEZ, JR., RICHARD D.
McCORMICK, CYNTHIA H. MILLIGAN,
NICHOLAS G. MOORE, DONALD B. RICE,
JUDITH M. RUNSTAD, STEPHEN W. SANGER,
and SUSAN G. SWENSON
10
11
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
OAKLAND DIVISION
16
17
18
J.N. FEUER, Derivatively on Behalf of
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY and its
Shareholders and “Double Derivatively” on
Behalf of WACHOVIA CORPORATION,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff,
v.
No. 10-CV-00279 YGR
Action Filed: January 20, 2010
(PROPOSED) ORDER AND FINAL
JUDGMENT
Judge: Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
G. KENNEDY THOMPSON; THOMAS J.
WURTZ; HERBERT SANDLER; MARION
SANDLER; JOHN T. CASTEEN, III;
JOSEPH NEUBAUER; MARYELLEN C.
HERRINGER; TIMOTHY D. PROCTOR;
VAN L. RICHEY; DONA DAVIS YOUNG;
ERNEST S. RADY; JERRY GITT; JOHN D.
BAKER, II; PETER C. BROWNING;
DONALD M. JAMES; JOHN C.
WHITTAKER, JR.; WILLIAM H.
GOODWIN, JR.; ROBERT A. INGRAM;
MACKEY J. MCDONALD; RUTH G.
SHAW; LANTY L. SMITH; JOHN S.
CHEN; LLOYD H. DEAN; SUSAN E.
(PROPOSED) ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT
NO. 10-CV-00279 YGR
NO. 12-CV-00203 YGR
2
3
4
ENGEL; ENRIQUE HERNANDEZ, JR.;
RICHARD D. MCCORMICK; CYNTHIA H.
MULLIGAN; NICHOLAS G. MOORE;
PHILIP J. QUIGLEY; DONALD B. RICE;
JUDITH M. RUNSTAD; STEPHEN W.
SANGER; ROBERT K. STEEL; JOHN G.
STUMPF; and SUSAN G. SWENSEN,
5
Defendants,
6
and
7
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,
8
Nominal Defendant.
9
10
11
W. M. ROGERS, Derivatively on Behalf of
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY and its
Shareholders,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
vs.
G. KENNEDY THOMPSON; THOMAS J.
WURTZ; JOHN T. CASTEEN, III;
JOSEPH NEUBAUER; MARYELLEN C.
HERRINGER; TIMOTHY D. PROCTOR; VAN
L. RICHEY; DONA DAVIS YOUNG; ERNEST
S. RADY; JERRY GITT; JOHN D. BAKER II;
PETER C. BROWNING; DONALD M. JAMES;
JOHN C. WHITTAKER, JR.; WILLIAM H.
GOODWIN, JR.; ROBERT A. INGRAM;
MACKEY J. McDONALD; RUTH G. SHAW;
LANTY L. SMITH; JOHN S. CHEN;
LLOYD H. DEAN; SUSAN E. ENGEL;
ENRIQUE HERNANDEZ, JR.;
RICHARD D. McCORMICK; CYNTHIA H.
MILLIGAN; NICHOLAS G. MOORE; PHILIP J.
QUIGLEY; DONALD B. RICE; JUDITH M.
RUNSTAD; STEPHEN W. SANGER, ROBERT
K. STEEL; JOHN G. STUMPF; SUSAN G.
SWENSON;
ROBERT L. JOSS; RICHARD M.
KOVACEVICH; MICHAEL W. WRIGHT;
ELAINE L. CHAO, FREDERICO F. PENA,
26
27
No.: 12-CV-00203 YGR
Defendants.
and
28
(PROPOSED) ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT
NO. 10-CV-00279 YGR
NO. 12-CV-00203 YGR
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY,
2
Nominal Defendant.
3
4
5
6
The motion to approve the proposed settlement of the above-captioned Derivative
7
Actions (the “Settlement”), came before this Court for hearing, as noticed, on March 5,
8
2013, pursuant to this Court’s Preliminary Approval Order, dated December 13, 2012 (Dkt.
9
No. 129 in Case No.: 10-CV-279; Dkt. No. 27 in Case No.: 12-CV-203) (the “Preliminary
10
Approval Order”);
11
The Court having heard and considered the matter, including all papers filed in
12
connection therewith, and the attorneys for the Parties having been heard in support of the
13
Settlement, and an opportunity to be heard having been given to all other persons desiring to
14
be heard, as provided in the Notice to Shareholders, and good cause appearing therefor;
15
THE COURT HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
16
17
Approval of the Stipulation of Settlement
1.
This Order and Final Judgment incorporates by reference the definitions in the
18
Stipulation of Settlement (Dkt No. 128-2 in Case No.: 10-CV-279; Dkt. No. 16-2 in Case
19
No.: 12-CV-203), and all terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the
20
Stipulation, unless otherwise set forth herein.
21
2.
This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Derivative Actions and
22
over all Parties to the Stipulation for the purpose of approving the Settlement of the
23
Derivative Actions.
24
3.
Based on evidence submitted, the Court finds that notice was published and
25
disseminated in accordance with this Court’s Preliminary Approval Order. This Court
26
further finds that the forms and contents of the Notice to Shareholders, as previously
27
preliminary approved by the Court, complied with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil
28
Procedure 23.1, satisfied the requirements of due process of the United States Constitution,
(PROPOSED) ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT
NO. 10-CV-00279 YGR
NO. 12-CV-00203 YGR
and constituted due and sufficient notice of the matters set forth therein.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
4.
A full and fair opportunity has been offered to Current Wells Fargo Shareholders
to object to the Settlement and to participate in the hearing thereon, and, as such, all Current
Wells Fargo Shareholders are bound by this Order and Final Judgment.
5.
The Settlement is found to be fair, reasonable and adequate.
6.
The Court finds, for settlement purposes, that the Derivative Actions were
properly brought as derivative actions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.1.
7.
The Motions for Final Approval of Proposed Settlement (Dkt. No. 129 in Case
No.: 10-CV-279; Dkt. No. 27 in Case No.: 12-CV-203) are GRANTED. The Stipulation of
the Settlement and the terms set forth therein, including the Releases of Released Claims,
are, in all respects, hereby finally APPROVED. The parties to the Stipulation are directed to
consummate the Settlement in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Stipulation,
including the payment of attorney’s fees and expenses to Plaintiff’s Counsel in the
Derivative Actions in the amount to be determined by separate Order on Plaintiffs’ Motion
for Award of Fees and Expenses.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dismissal With Prejudice and Release of Claims
8.
Definitions. As used below, the following definitions apply:
a.
“Released Claims” means any and all claims, demands, rights, remedies,
causes of action or liabilities, whether based on federal, state, local, statutory,
common or foreign law or any other law, rule, regulation, or principle of equity,
including all Settled Claims, whether known or unknown, including without
limitation Unknown Claims (defined in ¶ 1.25 of the Stipulation), whether
suspected or unsuspected, whether contingent or non-contingent, whether accrued
or unaccrued, whether concealed or hidden, whether factual or legal, and for any
remedy whether at equity or law, that were or that could have been asserted
against the Settling Defendants or the Released Parties in any of the Settled
Claims, or by any Wells Fargo and/or Wachovia Shareholder claiming in the
28
(PROPOSED) ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT
NO. 10-CV-00279 YGR
NO. 12-CV-00203 YGR
right of, or on behalf of Wells Fargo and/or Wachovia, arising out of, relating to
2
or based upon, directly or indirectly, in any way, any of the facts, allegations,
3
transactions, events, occurrences, acts, disclosures, statements, omissions, failures
4
to act, or matters set forth, referred to, or alleged in any of the Settled Claims;
5
specifically including, but not limited to, all claims for the benefit of Wells Fargo
6
that arise out of the merger of Wells Fargo and Wachovia, Wachovia’s
7
acquisition and operation of Golden West, risk management by Wachovia’s
8
officers and directors, telemarketing practices at Wachovia, alleged municipal
9
bid-rigging, money laundering, mutual fund disclosures, issuance of auction rates
10
securities, and settlement of the Arace Action. By operation of the Judgment, the
11
Releasing Parties shall have waived any and all provisions, rights, and benefits
12
conferred by California Civil Code § 1542 and by any law of any state or territory
13
of the United States, or principle of common law, which is similar, comparable,
14
or equivalent to California Civil Code § 1542 (see ¶ 1.25 of the Stipulation).
15
b.
16
former directors and officers of Wells Fargo and Wachovia, and each and all
17
members of their families, parent entities, affiliates, or subsidiaries, and each and
18
all of their respective past, present, or future officers, directors, employees,
19
attorneys,
20
c.
23
26
27
insurers,
auditors,
heirs,
executors,
personal
agents, representatives, trusts, trustees, trust beneficiaries, heirs and assigns.
22
25
accountants,
representatives, estates, administrators, predecessors, successors, custodians,
21
24
“Released Parties” means all Settling Defendants, all other current or
“Settling Defendants” means, collectively, the Individual Defendants and
Nominal Defendant Wells Fargo.
9.
The Derivative Actions and all claims contained therein are hereby dismissed
with prejudice in their entirety, on the merits. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs,
except as set forth in the Court’s Order as to the Motion for Award of Fees and Expenses.
10. Upon the date of this Order and Final Judgment, Plaintiffs, Wells Fargo, and all
28
(PROPOSED) ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT
NO. 10-CV-00279 YGR
NO. 12-CV-00203 YGR
Current Wells Fargo Shareholders, derivatively and on behalf of themselves, and their
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
respective current, future and former heirs, executors, administrators, personal
representatives, attorneys, agents, partners, successors and assigns, and any other person or
entity claiming (now or in the future) to have acted through or on behalf of them, shall
hereby be deemed to have, and by operation of this Order and Final Judgment shall: (i) have
fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, settled and discharged each of the Settling
Defendants and the Released Parties from all the Settled Claims and Released Claims; and
(ii) be forever barred and enjoined from commencing, instituting, prosecuting, continuing, or
in any way participating in the commencement or prosecution of any action asserting any of
the Settled Claims and Released Claims against any of the Settled Defendants or Released
Parties.
11. Except as set forth in paragraph 12 below, upon the Effective Date of the
Stipulation (as defined therein), each of the Settling Defendants, on behalf of himself,
herself, and/or itself and each and all members of his, her and/or its families, parent entities,
affiliates, or subsidiaries, and each and all of his, her and/or its respective past, present, or
future officers, directors, employees, attorneys, accountants, insurers, auditors, heirs,
executors, personal representatives, estates, administrators, predecessors, successors,
custodians, agents, representatives, trusts, trustees, trust beneficiaries and assigns shall be
deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever
released, relinquished, and discharged the Releasing Parties and Plaintiffs’ Counsel from all
claims or demands relating to, arising out of, or connected with the institution, prosecution,
assertion, settlement, or resolution of the Settled Claims or the Released Claims.
12. Nothing contained herein is intended to or shall be construed to limit, restrict or
otherwise affect any obligation of Wells Fargo or any of its insurers to defend and indemnify
former officers and directors of Wachovia, or impair any rights of any of the former
directors and officers of Wachovia under any contract of insurance, under the terms of the
merger agreement between Wells Fargo and Wachovia, or under any articles of
28
(PROPOSED) ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT
NO. 10-CV-00279 YGR
NO. 12-CV-00203 YGR
incorporation or bylaws of Wells Fargo or Wachovia.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
13. Without in any way affecting the finality of this Order and Final Judgment, this
Court shall retain jurisdiction over Plaintiffs, the Settling Defendants, and Wells Fargo with
respect to all matters related to the Derivative Actions and over all proceedings related to the
implementation and enforcement of the terms of the Stipulation, and to rule on Plaintiffs’
Motion for Award of Fees and Expenses.
14. Neither the Settlement, nor this Order and Final Judgment, nor the Stipulation,
nor its exhibits, nor any other papers relating to the Settlement, nor any negotiations,
discussions or proceedings in connection therewith shall be:
a. offered or received against any of the Settling Defendants or the Released
Parties as evidence of, or construed as, or deemed to be, evidence of any
presumption, concession, or admission by any of the Settling Defendants or
Released Parties of the truth of any fact alleged by Plaintiffs or the validity of any
claim that has been or could have been asserted in the Derivative Actions or in
any other proceeding, or the deficiency of any defense that could have been
asserted in the Derivative Actions or in any other proceeding, or of any alleged
liability, negligence, fault, or wrongdoing any of the Settling Defendants or the
Released Parties;
b.
in any way be construed as, offered as, received as, used as or deemed to be
evidence of any kind in the Derivative Actions, any other action, or any judicial,
administrative, regulatory or other proceeding, except a proceeding to enforce the
Stipulation, and except that the Settling Defendants or any of the Released Parties
may file the Stipulation and/or this Order and Final Judgment in any action that
may be brought against any of them in order to support a defense or counterclaim
based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith
settlement, judgment bar or reduction or any other theory of claim preclusion or
issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim;
28
(PROPOSED) ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT
NO. 10-CV-00279 YGR
NO. 12-CV-00203 YGR
c.
2
Plaintiffs as an admission or concession that the consideration to be given
3
hereunder represents the amount which could be or would have been recovered
4
after trial; or
5
d.
6
claims asserted in the Derivative Actions are without merit or that any infirmity
8
exists as to those claims.
9
e.
10
Court relating to the Settlement, or this Order and Final Judgment in connection
12
with any appeal of any Order of this Court in the Derivative Actions and/or
13
before this Court or before the Court of Appeals in connection with Plaintiffs’
14
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Nothing herein shall be construed to limit the parties from referring to
and/or relying upon the Stipulation, its exhibits, any documents filed with the
11
16
construed as or received in evidence as an admission, concession or
presumption against Plaintiffs or their counsel or any of them that any of the
7
15
construed against any of the Settling Defendants, the Released Parties or
Motion for Award of Fees and Expenses.
15. The Settlement shall be a final and complete resolution of all disputes among the
Parties.
16. Entry of the Order and Final Judgment fully and finally settles and disposes of
and discharges all of the Released Claims. If for any reason the Settlement does not become
effective in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation, this Order and Final Judgment, and
any related orders, shall be rendered null and void, of no further force or effect, and shall be
vacated nunc pro tunc. The parties shall then each be deemed to have reverted to their
respective status in the Derivative Actions as of the date of the Stipulation, and they shall
proceed in all respects as if the Stipulation had not been executed and this Order and Final
Judgment, and any related orders, had not been entered, preserving in that event all of the
parties’ claims and defenses in the Derivative Actions.
17. Without further order of the Court, the Parties to the Stipulation may agree to
reasonable extensions of time to carry out any of the provisions of the Stipulation.
28
(PROPOSED) ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT
NO. 10-CV-00279 YGR
NO. 12-CV-00203 YGR
18. The provisions of this Order and Final Judgment constitute a full and complete
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
adjudication of the matters considered and adjudged herein, and the Court determines that
there is no just reason for delay in the entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The Clerk is hereby directed to enter judgment in
accordance with this Order and Final Judgment as a final judgment with respect to all
matters ordered, judged and decreed.
This Order Terminates Dkt. No. 129 in Case No.: 10-CV-279 and Dkt. No. 27 in Case
No.: 12-CV-203.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED
11
12
13
DATED: March 29, 2013
___
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(PROPOSED) ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT
NO. 10-CV-00279 YGR
NO. 12-CV-00203 YGR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?