O'Brien et al v. AstraZeneca LP
ORDER re 20 re 23 Granting STIPULATED MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF REQUESTING STAY OF SEROQUEL CASES PENDING FINALIZATION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Motion 9 Terminated. Case Management Conference set for 1/25/2011 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 9/22/2010. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
PETER A. STROTZ, Bar No. 129904 firstname.lastname@example.org OLIVER Q. DUNLAP, Bar No. 225566 email@example.com 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1800 Oakland, California 94612-3520 Telephone: 510.444.3131 Facsimile: 510.839.7940
FILICE BROWN EASSA & MCLEOD LLP
Attorneys for Defendants ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - OAKLAND DIVISION DENNIS O'BRIEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, MCKESSON CORPORATION, Defendants. Case No. 4:10-cv-00289-CW
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF REQUESTING STAY OF SEROQUEL CASES PENDING FINALIZATION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Having considered the parties' Motion for Administrative Relief requesting requesting stay of the Seroquel cases pending finalization of the settlement agreement, PURSUANT TO
STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties will be required to provide the Court
with a joint update as to settlement progress by Wednesday December 15, 2010, and if the cases have not settled a case management conference will be held on Tuesday, January 25, 2011. The pending motion to remand in this case [Docket No. 9] is denied without prejudice to refiling if the settlement is not completed. Signed this 22nd day of September, 2010 at Oakland, California.
Judge of the United States District Court
04367 35044 ODUNLAP 637965.1
[PROPOSED] ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 4:09-CV-04148-CW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?