Gilhuly v. KMART Corporation

Filing 23

STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING REFERRAL TO COURT CONNECTED MEDIATION AND ASSIGNMENT TO PRIVATE MEDIATION re 22 Stipulation filed by Michael Gilhuly. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 6/7/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Matthew R. Bainer, Esq. (S.B. #220972) mbainer@scalaw.com Molly A. Kuehn, Esq. (S.B. #230763) mkuehn@scalaw.com SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC 1970 Broadway, Ninth Floor Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 891-9800 Facsimile: (510) 891-7030 Web: www.scalaw.com Attorneys for the Representative Plaintiff And the Plaintiff Class Gayle M. Athanacio (S.B. #130068) gathanacio@sonnenschein.com Virginia K. Young (S.B. #174384) vyoung@sonnenschein.com Megan Barker (S.B. #245991) mbarker@sonnenschein.com SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLP 525 Market Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 882-5000 Facsimile: (415) 882-0300 Attorneys for Defendant KMART CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION MICHAEL GILHULY, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. KMART CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:10-cv-0360-PJH CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]ORDER VACATING REFERRAL TO COURT CONNECTED MEDIATION AND ASSIGNMENT TO PRIVATE MEDIATION Date: May 6, 2010 Time: 2:00 p.m. Dept.: Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor Judge: Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING REFERRAL TO COURT CONNECTED MEDIATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS this Stipulation is entered into between Representative Plaintiff Michael Gilhuly ("Plaintiff") and Defendant KMART Corporation ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel of record; WHEREAS on May 6, 2010 the Court held an Initial Case Management Conference in this case and informed the parties that the case has been assigned to the Court ADR Program for mediation; WHEREAS the parties had previously reached an agreement to seek private mediation; WHEREAS the parties respectfully request that the Court enter an order in accordance with this Stipulation to vacate the Court's referral to the Court ADR program and to allow the parties to proceed with private mediation. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties through their respective counsel of record to VACATE the Court's referral of this case to the Court ADR program and to allow the parties to proceed with a private mediation. Dated: May 28, 2010 SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC By: /s/ Matthew R. Bainer Matthew R. Bainer, Esq. Attorneys for the Representative Plaintiff and the Plaintiff Class Dated: May 28, 2010 SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLP By: /s/ Gayle M. Athanacio Gayle M. Athanacio, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant KMART CORPORATION 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING REFERRAL TO COURT CONNECTED MEDIATION 1 2 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 J ER N D IS T IC T R OF 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING REFERRAL TO COURT CONNECTED MEDIATION A C LI FO yllis J. udge Ph Hamilto n R NIA By: ________________________________ D HON. PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON RDERE Judge of IT IS SO OCourt the Superior UNIT ED 4 Dated: June 7 ___, 2010 S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?