Nicosia et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 58

SCHEDULING ORDER Re Preliminary Injunction Hearing. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 10/28/2010. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2010)

Download PDF
Nicosia et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al Doc. 58 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANTHONY NICOSIA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants. _______________________________/ The court is in receipt of the parties' stipulation seeking to continue the hearing date on plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction until February 2011. In view of the length of the requested continuance and number of continuances already requested and granted for the hearing on the motion for preliminary injunction, the court is not inclined to grant said request. Construing the request as one to withdraw the motion and vacate the hearing date, the request is granted without prejudice to plaintiffs re-filing the motion, if necessary, in accordance with any updated schedule for a trustee's sale of the real property in question. In light of the parties' stipulation, the court also withdraws its offer to advance the hearing on the motion to remand so that the court might consider it in connection with any hearing on the motion for preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs' motion to remand will be heard, as presently scheduled, on November 17, 2010, unless the court notifies the parties in advance of that date that no hearing is necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 28, 2010 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge No. C 10-0398 PJH SCHEDULING ORDER RE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?