Davis v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Trustee, As Trustee for Series HBV 2007-3 et al
ORDER re 29 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; 30 MOTION to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Complaint; 40 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; 41 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 4/30/2010. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ESTELLE DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., TRUSTEE, AS TRUSTEE FOR SERIES HBV 2007-3, et al., Defendants. _______________________________/ Presently pending before the court are motions by defendants GMAC Mortgage LLC ("GMAC"), and Wells Fargo N.A., Trustee ("Wells Fargo"), for orders dismissing the complaint in the above-entitled action, and striking portions of the complaint. GMAC's motion is set for hearing on May 12, 2010, and Wells Fargo's motion is set for hearing on May 26, 2010. Plaintiff's opposition to GMAC's motion was due on April 21, 2010, and her opposition to Wells Fargo's motion is due on May 5, 2010. Rather than filing an opposition to GMAC's motion, however, plaintiff on April 26, 2010 filed a first amended complaint. The court has not reviewed defendants' motions, and thus makes no finding as to whether the first amended complaint resolves the issues raised by defendants. The court finds, however, that the interests of judicial economy will be better served if defendants withdraw the motions, and respond instead to the first amended complaint, by filing responsive pleadings or motions to dismiss by May 19, 2010. No. C 10-0489 PJH ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 30, 2010 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?