Morrison et al v. Credit Acceptance Corporation

Filing 6

STIPULATION AND ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND re 5 Stipulation filed by Credit Acceptance Corporation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/17/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

MARK D. LONERGAN (State Bar No. 143622) [e-mail] REGINA J. McCLENDON (State Bar No. 184669) [e-mail] ERIK KEMP (State Bar No. 246196) [e-mail] SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 ANDRE MORRISON, ERLINDA DEL ROSARIO, MARIE DEL ROSARIO, 13 individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 14 Plaintiff, 15 vs. 16 CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION; 17 and DOES 1 through 50, 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants.

Case No.: CV 10-00549 EMC STIPULATION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ; ORDER Civil Local Rule 6-1(a)

Complaint Filed: December 8, 2009

WHEREAS, plaintiff Andre Morrison filed the above-entitled action on December 8, 2009, in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Alameda, which named Credit Acceptance Corporation as a defendant; WHEREAS, Morrison, Erlinda Del Rosario, and Marie Del Rosario filed a first amended complaint against Credit Acceptance on January 13, 2010, also in the Alameda County Superior Court; WHEREAS, Credit Acceptance removed the action to this Court on February 8, 2010, making its deadline to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' first amended complaint February 16, 2010;
10858/0004/790068.1

Stipulation for Enlargement of Time Case No.: CV 10-00549 EMC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WHEREAS, Local Rule 6-1(a) of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California provides that the parties may stipulate to extend the time for responding to a complaint without leave of Court; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs, on the one hand, and Credit Acceptance, on the other, through their respective counsel of record herein, that Credit Acceptance may have an extension of time to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' first amended complaint to and including March 18, 2010. This extension of time will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order. IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: February 12, 2010

SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation By: /s/ Erik Kemp Erik Kemp

Attorneys for Defendant CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
I, Erik Kemp, am the ecf user whose identification and password are being used to file this document. I hereby attest that Bryan Kemnitzer has concurred in this filing. /s/

Erik Kemp Erik Kemp

DATED: February 12, 2010
IT IS SO ORDERED: TES DISTRICT C A
D _________________ RDERE IS SO O IT Edward M. Chen U.S. Magistrate Judge
dwa Judge E rd M. C

KEMNITZER, BARRON & KRIEG LLP

UNIT ED

S

T

hen

ER

N

10858/0004/790068.1

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

R NIA

RT U O

By:

/s/ Bryan Kemnitzer Bryan Kemnitzer

Attorneys for Plaintiffs ANDRE MORRISON, ERLINDA DEL ROSARIO, and MARIE DEL ROSARIO

NO

RT

H

-2Stipulation for Enlargement of Time Case No.: CV 10-00549 EMC