Narvaez v. Credit Bureau of Ukiah, Inc.

Filing 39

ORDER Granting 38 MOTION to Continue the March 31, 2011 Hearing on Defendant's 35 Motion for Summary Judgment to April 14, 2011. Case Management Statement due by 4/7/2011. Further Case Management Conference set for 4/14/2011 02:00 PM. Motion Hearing set for 4/14/2011 02:00 PM before Hon. Claudia Wilken. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/16/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Michael S. Agruss (SBN: 259567) KROHN & MOSS, LTD. 10474 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 401 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Tel: 323-988-2400 x235 Fax: 866-620-2956 magruss@consumerlawcenter.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, GREGORY NARVAEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION GREGORY NARVAEZ, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 10-CV-00553 CW ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO CONTINUE THE MARCH 31, 2011 HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO APRIL 14, 2011 Honorable Claudia Wilken 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 CREDIT BUREAU OF UKIAH, 12 Defendant. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's, GREGORY NARVAEZ ("Plaintiff"), Request to Continue the March 31, 2011 Hearing on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment to April 14, 2011 is GRANTED. As such, Plaintiff shall file its Opposition brief to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment by March 24, 2011, and Defendant shall file its Reply in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment by March 31, 2011. If is further ordered that the Case Management Conference set for March 31, 2011 is also continued to April 14, 2011, with the Case Management Statement due by April 7, 2011. IT IS SO ORDERED. 3/16/2011 DATED: _________________ 24 25 __________________________________ Judge of the Unites States District Court Honorable Claudia Wilken -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?