Bonner v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al

Filing 41

ORDER NOT RULING ON THE REQUEST TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO COMPLETE MEDIATION AND GRANTING THE REQUEST SEEKING TELEPHONIC ATTENDANCE AT THE MEDIATION SESSION, re doc 35 Notice. Mr. Norton or Mr. Adamson shall be available at all times to participate in the mediation session in accordance with ADR L.R. 6-10(f). Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 3/23/2011. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2011)

Download PDF
Bonner v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al Doc. 41 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 13 14 15 16 17 Before the court is defendants' request to continue the mediation deadline, and to grant 18 permission for defendants' representative to attend the mediation telephonically. The undersigned 19 has no authority to grant an extension of any case management deadline, and refers the parties to 20 Magistrate Judge Beeler if they wish to seek an extension of the deadline to complete mediation. 21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request for defendants' representative, General Counsel 22 Bryan Norton or Deputy Counsel Jeremy Adamson, to attend telephonically as yet unscheduled 23 mediation before Peter Sherwood is GRANTED. Mr. Norton or Mr. Adamson shall be available at 24 all times to participate in the mediation session in accordance with ADR L.R. 6-10(f). 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 March 23, 2011 Dated By: Elizabeth D. Laporte United States Magistrate Judge Date: Mediator: Unscheduled Peter Sherwood For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California Oakland Division CHARLES A. BONNER, Plaintiff, v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., et al., Defendants. _____________________________________/ No. C 10-0609 LB ORDER NOT RULING ON THE REQUEST TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO COMPLETE MEDIATION AND GRANTING THE REQUEST SEEKING TELEPHONIC ATTENDANCE AT THE MEDIATION SESSION Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?