Raman v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 114

ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 113 Letter filed by City and County of San Francisco. Joint Case Management Statement due by 5/20/2010. Case Management Conference set for 5/27/2010 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/31/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2010)

Download PDF
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY LAUREN MONSON Deputy City Attorney Direct Dial: Email: (415) 554-3856 lauren.monson@sfgov.org March 26, 2010 Via E-file to Court The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton 1301 Clay Street 3rd Floor, Courtroom 3 Oakland, CA 94612 Re: Shania Raman v. City and County of San Francisco, et al C 10-0752 PJH Dear Judge Hamilton: I am a Deputy City Attorney and counsel of record for Defendant City and County of San Francisco. The above matter was recently severed from Case No. C08-4702 PJH, Lam, et al v. City and County of San Francisco,et al. Defendants the City and Thomasson separately answered Raman's third amended complaint on March 15, 2010. The parties have met and conferred and propose the following date for a Case Management Conference in this matter: May 27, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. I have spoken with counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant Thomasson, and they have authorized me to state that the parties join in this letter. The parties respectfully request that the Court set an initial Case Management Conference in this matter for that date. Very truly yours, DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney /s/ Lauren M. Monson Deputy City Attorney cc: Evgenii Sverdlov, via e-file Geoffrey Gordon-Creed, via e-file S ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O UNIT ED 3/31/10 ER N F D IS T IC T O R FOX PLAZA 1390 MARKET STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94102 RECEPTION: (415) 554-3800 FACSIMILE: (415) 557-6939 n:\labor\li2010\100944\00619033.doc A C LI FO h Judge P yllis J. H amilton R NIA O ORD IT IS S ERED NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?