King v. Cate

Filing 5

STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 7/8/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2010)

Download PDF
King v. Cate Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ERIK G. BABCOCK, Bar No. 172517 LAW OFFICES OF ERIK BABCOCK 1212 Broadway, Suite 726 Oakland, CA 94612-3423 (510) 452-8400 Tel (510) 452-8405 Fax Attorney for Petitioner Darrel King IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DARREL KING, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Defendant. On May 3, 2010, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 10-778-SBA STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS Respondent filed a Motion To Dismiss petitioner's federal habeas corpus petition. Whereas counsel for petitioner has been in trial in a murder case in state court in People v. Omar Chavez, Sonoma County Superior Court No. SCR 498567 for approximately six weeks, since May 24, 2010, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties, by and through their respective counsel, that the time in which petitioner may file a brief or memorandum in opposition to respondent's motion /// /// Stipulation and Proposed Order United States v. Long Lam, No. CR 08-0461 PJH (MEJ) Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 to dismiss may be extended by four weeks to and including July 30, 2010. SO STIPULATED. DATED: July 1, 2010 By: /S/Jennifer Ross Jennifer Ross Deputy Attorney General Attorney for Respondent DATED: July 1, 2010 By: /S/Erik Babcock ERIK BABCOCK Attorney for Petitioner SO ORDERED. DATED:7/8/10 Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Stipulation and Proposed Order United States v. Long Lam, No. CR 08-0461 PJH (MEJ) Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?