Jackson v. National Check Processing (NCP)

Filing 15

ORDER VACATING HEARING RE: MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 12/7/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2010)

Download PDF
Jackson v. National Check Processing (NCP) Doc. 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California WALTER JACKSON, v. Plaintiff, No. C 10-0848 SBA (MEJ) ORDER VACATING HEARING RE: MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING NATIONAL CHECK PROCESSING (NCP), Defendant. _____________________________________/ 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: December 7, 2010 _______________________________ Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge The above-captioned case was referred to Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James to prepare a report and recommendation on Plaintiff's pending Motion for Default Judgment. (Dkt. #11.) As Defendant has failed to respond to Plaintiff's motion or otherwise appear in this matter, the Court VACATES the December 16, 2010 hearing. Prior to issue a report and recommendation, however, the undersigned ORDERS Plaintiff to provide supplemental briefing. In his motion, Plaintiff spends 12 pages discussing why he is entitled to attorney's fees, yet he devotes merely half of a page ­ one paragraph ­ to discussing the merits of his claims. And, in that paragraph, he only recites the allegations in his Complaint without any explanation or legal authority. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall file a supplemental brief by December 14, 2010, which addresses the merits of his claims and provides legal authority that supports his claims. The undersigned is particularly interested in cases that have granted default judgment under similar claims. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?