Kennedy v. Bank of America National Association et al
Filing
18
ORDER re 15 Granting Stipulation. Case Management Statement is due on 7/8/2010. Case Management Conference set for 7/15/2010 02:00 PM. Motion Hearing set for 7/15/2010 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 6/15/2010. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6
JOHN B. McMORROW, ESQ. SBN 71911 LAW OFFICESOF JOHN B. McMORROW A Professional Corporation 39650Liberty Street,Suite250 Fremont,CA 94538-2226 Telephone: (510) 651-9961 Facsimile: (510) 657-3467
Emai!: _ibmcmorrow(Q).sbcclobal.net
7
8 9
Attorney for Plaintiff, CLAUDIA KENNEDY
IN THE UNITED STATES DISCTRICf COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
CLAUDIA KENNEDY t
10
11 12
CASE NO. CVIO-OO868
13
14
15
Plaintiff, v BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIAnON; BANK OF AMERICA CORPORA nON; STEVE OWEN, Manager,BANK OF AMERICA, Hayward, California; andDOES 1 through 100,inclusive, Defendants.
STIPULAnON REQUESTING A CHANGE OF A HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOnON TO DISMISS TO JULY 8, 2010 OR LATER AT THE COURT'S CONVENIENCE
16
17
18
19
20 21 22
SftPULAftON
23
24
1.
DefendantsBank of America,National Association,Bank of America ,
Corporation,and SteveOwen(collectively, "Defendants")and Plaintiff Claudia Kennedy,by and throughtheir undersigned counsel,herebystipulateand agreeto continuethe hearingon Defendants'Motion to Dismissto July 8, 2010,or later at the Court's convenience.
S'I1PULAnON REQUES11NG CHANGE OF A HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION A TO DISMISS TO JULY 8,2010 OR LATER AT mE COURT'S CONVENIENCE
25 26
1
2 3 4 5 6
2
Plaintiff requested Stipulationfrom Defendants'because this during the
week of May 17 to 21, 2010,Plaintiff's counselcomputersystemsuffereda catastrophic failure and asresult, Plaintiff s counseloffice did not havecomputer access did not actuallyreceivethe Notice moving the hearingfrom July 7, 2010 to and July 1, 2010. During the courseof a routinecommunication with the clerk of the Court on June 10, 2010,we learnedof this change.
7
8 9
3
Both partiesrequestthat the Scheduling Conference also scheduled for
July 1,2010, be movedto the samedateasthe Motion or at the Court's convenience. 4 Both partiesagreeto the stipulationasindicatedby tlteir signatures
10
11 12
that the Court approvethe Stipulatio~ below The partiesrespectfullyrequest pursuantto Civil_L.R.6-2 andenteran Orderthereupon.A form of proposedOrder is filed herewith Dated: June 10,2010 RespectfullySubmitt~ ORRICK. HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFEE By:
/sf
13
14
15
16 17
18 19
Michael D. Weil Attorneysfor Defendants, Bank of America, National Association,Bank of America Corporation,and SteveOwen
I herebyattestthat the concurrence the filing of this documenthasbeen in obtainedfrom Michael D. Weil, Attorneysfor Defendants, Bank of America, National Association,Bank of America Corporation,and SteveOwen LA~;!.!:J:~~~ :t)F JOHN B. M cM 0 RROW
20
21 22 23
Dated:June 10,2010
24 25 26 27
l8~" IN.. ~ m~ --.CA~
ohn B. Mcmorrow Attorney for Plaintiff, ClaudiaKennedy
28
A..x:.
STIPULAnON REQUESTINGA CHANGE OF A HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOll0N TO DISMISS TO JULY 8, 2010OR LATERAT'niE COURT'S CONVENIENCE 2
~81"1
1 2
3 4 5 6
ORDER
The Court having considered aboveStipulation,and good causeappearing the therefore,IT IS HEREBY ORDEREDthat the scheduled Defendants'Motion to Dismissdateof July 1, 2010 is vacated, shall be rescheduled and for July 15 ,2010 at 2:00 p.m.
IT IS HEREBY ORDEREDthat the Scheduling Conference July 1,2010 is of vacated,and shall be rescheduled for 2:00 p.m. July 15 -,2010 at
7
8 9
10 11
12
DatedJune
15 -,2010
-
13
14
JudgeClaudiaWilken UNITED STATESDISTRICT JUDGE
15
16 17
18
19
20 21
22 23
24
25 26 27
28
all .. ~ m LIIerty~
t-~.
AJ!C. IIdk BI
STIPULATION REQUES'nNG A CHANGE OF A HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS' MO1l0N TO DISMISS TO JULY 8,2010 OR LATER AT THE COURT'S CONVENIENCE 3
w-.CA~ ~et-l
.
~
. . . . . . . . . . . . . I1IIIII111111 .
. . . . . . .
. .-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?