Powertech Technology Inc v. Tessera Inc

Filing 296

ORDER re (551 in 4:11-cv-06121-CW and 295 in 4:10-cv-00945-CW) of Dismissal with Prejudice. ***Civil Case Terminated.*** Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 9/24/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2014)

1 BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
G. Hopkins Guy III (124811)
2 [e-mail]
1001 Page Mill Road, Suite 200
3 Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
5 BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
David M. Genender (Pro Hac Vice)
6 [e-mail]
2001 Ross Avenue
7 Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone: [phone]
8 Facsimile: [phone]
9 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant
Powertech Technology Inc. and Additional
10 Defendant on Counterclaims Macrotech Technology Inc.
11 IRELL & MANELLA LLP
Morgan Chu (70446) ([e-mail])
12 Laura A. Seigle (171358) ([e-mail])
1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
13
Los Angeles, California 90067-4276
14 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
15
Attorneys for Defendant and
16 Counterclaimant Tessera, Inc.
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19

OAKLAND DIVISION

20 POWERTECH TECHNOLOGY INC., a
Taiwanese corporation,
21
Plaintiff,
22
vs.
23
24 TESSERA, INC., a Delaware corporation,
25

Defendant.

26 TESSERA, INC., a Delaware corporation,
27
28

Counterclaimant,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
-1-

Case No. 4:10-cv-00945-CW
Case No. 4:11-cv-06121-CW
STIPULATED CONDITIONAL
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE

Judge: Hon. Claudia A. Wilken

STIPULATED CONDITIONAL
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Case No. 10-cv-00945-CW
Case No. 11-cv-06121-CW

vs.

1

2 POWERTECH TECHNOLOGY INC., a
Taiwanese corporation,
3
Counterclaim Defendant,
4
5 MACROTECH TECHNOLOGY INC., a
Taiwanese corporation,
6
Additional Defendant on
Counterclaims
7

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

8
The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this cause,

9

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause be dismissed with prejudice; provided,

10
11
12
13
14

however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court on or before March 31, 2015, with
proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said
settlement due and payable as of that date has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall
stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

15

16 DATED: September 19, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

17

BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.

18

By:__/s/ G. Hopkins Guy III
G. Hopkins Guy III

19

Attorney for PTI and MTI

20
21 DATED: September 19, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

22

IRELL & MANELLA LLP

23

By:

24

/s/ Laura Seigle________
Laura Seigle

Attorney for Tessera, Inc.

25
26
27

DATED: 9/24/2014

___________________________
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

28

3129643

-2-

STIPULATED CONDITIONAL
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Case No. 10-cv-00945-CW
Case No. 11-cv-06121-CW