Powertech Technology Inc v. Tessera Inc

Filing 88

ORDER Granting 85 Stipulation CHANGING DATE FOR UPCOMING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES. Case Management Statement due by 12/28/2011. Case Management Conference set for 1/4/2012 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 11/1/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2011)

Download PDF
1 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP Gina A. Bibby (CA 242657) gbibby@foley.com 2 975 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1013 3 Telephone: (650) 856-3700 Facsimile: (650) 856-3710 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff Powertech Technology Inc. 5 6 IRELL & MANELLA LLP Morgan Chu (CA 70446) mchu@irell.com 7 Joseph M. Lipner (CA 155735) jlipner@irell.com Kenneth J. Weatherwax (CA 218612) kweatherwax@irell.com 8 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900 Los Angeles, CA 90067-4276 9 Telephone: (310) 277-1010 Facsimile: (310) 203-7199 10 Attorneys for Defendant Tessera, Inc. 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 OAKLAND DIVISION 15 16 POWERTECH TECHNOLOGY INC., 17 Plaintiff, 18 19 v. 20 21 22 TESSERA, INC., Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IRELL & MANELLA LLP A Registered Limited Liability Law Partnership Including Professional Corporations CORRECTED JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING DATE OF UPCOMING CASE MGT. CONFERENCE & RELATED DATES (No. 10-00945 CW) 2270336 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C 10-00945 CW CORRECTED JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING DATE OF UPCOMING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Powertech Technology, Inc. 2 (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Tessera, Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through their counsel of record as 3 follows: 4 1. WHEREAS, this Court issued a Related Case Order on March 22, 2010 in this 5 declaratory judgment action (“the Action”) finding that the case known as Siliconware Precision 6 Industries Co., Ltd. et al. v. Tessera, Inc., Case No. C 08-03667 CW (“the Siliconware Case”), is 7 related to this Action; 8 2. WHEREAS, this Court issued an Order on June 1, 2010 dismissing this Action; 9 3. WHEREAS, plaintiff Powertech Technology, Inc. filed a Notice of Appeal on 10 August 6, 2010; 11 4. WHEREAS, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a published 12 decision on September 30, 2011 to reverse and remand; 13 5. WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 35 and 40 and 14 Federal Circuit Rule of Practice 40, the mandate of the Court of Appeals will not issue unless the 15 time permitted to seek rehearing of the final decision of that court expires, or unless that court 16 denies rehearing if it is sought; 17 6. WHEREAS, the parties to this Action, by their undersigned counsel, report to the 18 Court that, according to PACER, the Court of Appeals issued an order on October 27, 2011 19 granting Tessera’s unopposed motion to extend time to seek rehearing until November 14, 2011; 20 7. WHEREAS, by minute order of October 13, 2011 this Court set a Case 21 Management Conference in this Action for November 8, 2011at 2:00 p.m., together with the 22 related Siliconware Case; 23 8. WHEREAS, because a final resolution of the appeal of the dismissal of this Action, 24 including appeals, is still pending, and the mandate of the Court of Appeals has not yet issued to 25 this Court, and the parties to this Action believe that it would be most efficient to postpone the 26 case management conference and related activity in this Action until approximately January 3, 27 2011; 28 IRELL & MANELLA LLP A Registered Limited Liability Law Partnership Including Professional Corporations CORRECTED JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING DATE OF UPCOMING CASE MGT. CONFERENCE & RELATED DATES (No. 10-00945 CW) 2270336 -1- 1 9. WHEREAS, the parties to this Action agree that there would be no prejudice to the 2 parties in moving the case management conference, as the mandate has not yet been returned and 3 will not be returned by the date of the presently scheduled case management conference; and 4 10. 5 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the WHEREAS, both parties concur in the filing of this document; 6 parties appearing below through their undersigned respective attorneys of record, based on the 7 foregoing, and subject to the approval of this Court, that: 8 The case management conference currently scheduled for November 8, 2011, at 2:00 p.m. 9 in this Action shall be rescheduled for January 3, 2012, at 2:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the 10 Court is available. The case management statement shall be due seven days before the date set for 11 the case management conference. ORDER 12 13 . PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The case management 14 conference will be held on Wednesday, January 4, 2012, at 2:00 p.m. 15 Dated: ___________, 2011 November 1 16 _________________________________________ Honorable Claudia Wilken United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IRELL & MANELLA LLP A Registered Limited Liability Law Partnership Including Professional Corporations CORRECTED JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING DATE OF UPCOMING CASE MGT. CONFERENCE & RELATED DATES (No. 10-00945 CW) 2270336 -2- 1 2 SO STIPULATED. 3 4 Dated: October 28, 2011 By: 5 6 7 8 /s/ Gina Bibby Gina Bibby gbibby@foley.com FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 975 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1013 Telephone: (650) 856-3700 Facsimile: (650) 856-3710 Counsel for Plaintiff Powertech Technology, Inc. 9 10 11 Dated: October 28, 2011 By: 12 13 14 15 Counsel for Defendant Tessera, Inc. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IRELL & MANELLA LLP A Registered Limited Liability Law Partnership Including Professional Corporations /s/ Kenneth Weatherwax Kenneth Weatherwax kweatherwax@irell.com IRELL & MANELLA LLP 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 203-7946 Facsimile: (310) 203-7199 CORRECTED JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING DATE OF UPCOMING CASE MGT. CONFERENCE & RELATED DATES (No. 10-00945 CW) 2270336 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?