Smith v. Does
ORDER by Judge Hamilton Granting 16 Motion to Extend Time for Service of Complaint (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2010) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/16/2010: # 1 Certificate of Service) (nah, COURT STAFF).
Smith v. Does
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. JOHN DOES 1-10 d/b/a Straighttalknews.org, Defendants. _______________________________/ Before the court is plaintiff's motion to extend time for service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Plaintiff asserts good cause for her motion, because although she promptly began efforts to ascertain the identify of the proper Doe defendants in this action via service of a subpoena on the appropriate third party, she has not yet had sufficient time to complete those efforts. The court GRANTS plaintiff's motion to extend time for service, and grants plaintiff until September 8, 2010, in which to effect service of process upon defendant(s). Plaintiff is furthermore instructed to include a proposed order with all future motions filed before the court, as required by Civil Local Rule 7-2(c). GWENDOLYN SMITH, Plaintiff, No. C 10-0996 PJH ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR SERVICE OF COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 16, 2010 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?