Old Republic Home Protection Co., Inc. v. CHW Group Inc.

Filing 10

ORDER re 6 Order. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 6/14/10. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 OLD REPUBLIC HOME PROTECTION COMPANY, INC., 7 Plaintiff, 8 vs. 9 CHW GROUP INC., 10 Defendant. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated:XXXXX6/14/10 9/14/10 ____________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge Defendant has submitted a pro se request to enlarge its time to file a response to the complaint by 60 days. Defendant requests this extension in order to afford them sufficient time to retain counsel to represent them in this action. Plaintiff's counsel apparently has refused Defendant's request to stipulate to an extension. Defendant should be aware that "a corporation may appear in the federal courts only through licensed counsel." Rowland v. California Men's Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 201-02 (1993). As such, Defendant's appearance in this action must be made through an attorney. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant's request for an extension of time to file a response to the complaint is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case No: CV 10-01079 SBA AMENDED ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?