Terrell v. Harder Mechanical Contractors Inc et al

Filing 115

ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket Nos. 94, 97 and 107). Signed by Judge Wilken on 5/3/2011. (cwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2011)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 LINDA TERRELL, 5 6 7 8 9 Plaintiff, v. HARDER MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC., a corporation; FLUOR CONSTRUCTION, a corporation; and GENE ARCENEAUX, an individual, ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 94, 97 & 107) Defendants. 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California No. C 10-01080 CW / 11 12 On April 28, 2011 Defendant Fluor Construction moved for 13 summary judgement as to Plaintiff Linda Terrell’s complaint or, in 14 the alternative, partial summary judgment. 15 same day, Gene Arceneaux, a former Fluor Construction employee 16 accused of harassment in the present action, moved for summary 17 judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment on 18 Terrell’s claims. 19 Arceneaux share the same counsel. 20 Mechanical Contractors also moved for summary judgment on Terrell’s 21 action or, in the alternative, summary adjudication. 22 107. 23 Docket Nos. 97. Docket No. 94. On the Fluor Construction and On April 28, 2011 Harder Docket No. All three motions were noticed for hearing on June 2, 2011. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a)(3), the 24 Court issues the following order to streamline briefing on these 25 pending motions. 26 to exceed forty pages, addressing Fluor’s, Arceneaux’s and Harder’s 27 motions for summary judgment. 28 Terrell shall file a single opposition brief, not If Fluor Construction and Arceneaux 1 both wish to reply to Terrell’s opposition, they shall reply 2 jointly in a single brief, not to exceed twenty-pages. 3 wishes to submit a reply brief to Terrell’s opposition, it shall do 4 so in a separate brief. 5 If Harder This order does not alter hearing date or deadlines for when 6 the parties’ respective briefs are due. 7 briefing related to Arceneaux’s motion for summary judgment on 8 Harder’s cross claim, which was also filed on April 28, 2011. 9 Nor does this order alter IT IS SO ORDERED. United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 Dated:5/3/2011 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?