Terrell v. Harder Mechanical Contractors Inc et al

Filing 115

ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket Nos. 94, 97 and 107). Signed by Judge Wilken on 5/3/2011. (cwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2011)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

LINDA TERRELL,

5
6
7
8
9

Plaintiff,
v.
HARDER MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC.,
a corporation; FLUOR CONSTRUCTION, a
corporation; and GENE ARCENEAUX, an
individual,

ORDER REGARDING
BRIEFING ON
DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Docket No. 94,
97 & 107)

Defendants.

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

No. C 10-01080 CW

/

11
12

On April 28, 2011 Defendant Fluor Construction moved for

13

summary judgement as to Plaintiff Linda Terrell’s complaint or, in

14

the alternative, partial summary judgment.

15

same day, Gene Arceneaux, a former Fluor Construction employee

16

accused of harassment in the present action, moved for summary

17

judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment on

18

Terrell’s claims.

19

Arceneaux share the same counsel.

20

Mechanical Contractors also moved for summary judgment on Terrell’s

21

action or, in the alternative, summary adjudication.

22

107.

23

Docket Nos. 97.

Docket No. 94.

On the

Fluor Construction and
On April 28, 2011 Harder

Docket No.

All three motions were noticed for hearing on June 2, 2011.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a)(3), the

24

Court issues the following order to streamline briefing on these

25

pending motions.

26

to exceed forty pages, addressing Fluor’s, Arceneaux’s and Harder’s

27

motions for summary judgment.

28

Terrell shall file a single opposition brief, not

If Fluor Construction and Arceneaux

1

both wish to reply to Terrell’s opposition, they shall reply

2

jointly in a single brief, not to exceed twenty-pages.

3

wishes to submit a reply brief to Terrell’s opposition, it shall do

4

so in a separate brief.

5

If Harder

This order does not alter hearing date or deadlines for when

6

the parties’ respective briefs are due.

7

briefing related to Arceneaux’s motion for summary judgment on

8

Harder’s cross claim, which was also filed on April 28, 2011.

9

Nor does this order alter

IT IS SO ORDERED.

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

Dated:5/3/2011
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2