Tuero v. Aaron Brothers, Inc. et al

Filing 109

ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong 98 (1) APPROVING INCENTIVE PAYMENTS TO NAMED PLAINTIFFS, (2) APPROVING CLASS COUNSELS REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS FEES, (3) APPROVING CLASS COUNSELS REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF LITIGATION COSTS (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 OAKLAND DIVISION 12 13 16 ORDER: (1) APPROVING INCENTIVE PAYMENTS TO NAMED PLAINTIFFS, (2) APPROVING CLASS COUNSELS’ REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS FEES, (3) APPROVING CLASS COUNSELS’ REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF LITIGATION COSTS Plaintiffs, 14 15 CASE NO. C 10-1089 SBA JOSE TIJERO, AMANDA GODFREY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. AARON BROTHERS, INC., Defendant. 17 18 Date: May 27, 2014 Time: 1:00 p.m. Judge: Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong 19 20 21 22 The above-referenced Motion for Approval of Incentive Payment Awards to named Plaintiffs Jose Tijero and Amanda Godfrey; Request for Approval of Attorneys Fees; and Request for Reimbursement of Litigation Costs having come before this Court on May 27, 2014, for a hearing, 23 and due and adequate notice having been given to all Class Members as required in the Preliminary 24 Approval Order, and the Court having considered all papers filed and proceedings had herein and 25 otherwise being fully informed and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ORDERED, 26 ADJUDGED AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: 27 1. The Court hereby confirms Badame & Associates, APC and the Law Offices of Daniel 28 1 ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF INCENTIVE PAYMENTS TO NAMED PLAINTIFFS AND APPROVAL OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS 1 2 L. Feder, as Class Counsel in the Action. 2. Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement, and the authorities, evidence and argument 3 submitted by Class Counsel, as well as the submitted Declarations of Class Representatives Jose 4 Tijero and Amanda Godfrey, the Court hereby approves and orders Service Payments to Class 5 Representatives in the following amounts: Jose Tijero: $5,000.00 and Amanda Godfrey: $5,000.00. 6 3. Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement, and the authorities, evidence and argument 7 submitted by Class Counsel, the Court hereby awards Class Counsel attorneys’ fees in the amount of 8 $266,666.66 as final payment for and complete satisfaction of any and all attorneys’ fees incurred by 9 and/or owed to Class Counsel and any other person or entity related to the Action. The Court further 10 orders that the award of attorneys’ fees set forth in this Paragraph shall be administered pursuant to 11 the terms of the Stipulation, and transferred and/or made payable equally to Badame & Associates, 12 APC and the Law Offices of Daniel L. Feder as Class Counsel in the Action. 13 4. Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement, and the authorities, evidence and argument 14 submitted by Class Counsel, the Court hereby awards Class Counsel reimbursement of litigation 15 costs in the amount of $29,356.19 as follows: Reimbursement to Badame & Associates, APC in the 16 amount of $14,871.71 and the Law Offices of Daniel L. Feder, LLP in the amount of $14,484.48, as 17 final payment for and complete satisfaction of any and all litigation costs incurred by and/or owed to 18 Class Counsel and any other person or entity related to the Action. The Court further orders that the 19 reimbursement of litigation costs set forth in this Paragraph shall be administered pursuant to the 20 terms of the Stipulation, and transferred and/or made payable to Badame & Associates, APC and the 21 22 Law Offices of Daniel L. Feder as Class Counsel in the Action, as noted above. IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: ___________________, 2014 May 28 25 26 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge 27 28 2 ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF INCENTIVE PAYMENTS TO NAMED PLAINTIFFS AND APPROVAL OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?