Chung v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 29

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO FILE ITS RESPONSE TO 21 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS by close of business on March 4, 2011. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on February 28, 2011. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2011)

Chung v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Doc. 29

1 2 NOT FOR CITATION 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 28, 2011 NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge IT IS SO ORDERED. The district court has referred Plaintiff's motion to compel Defendant City and County of San Francisco's responses to Interrogatories Nos. 1-5 (Set One) and for sanctions to this Court for determination. Doc. Nos. 21 & 25. Plaintiff filed his motion on January 18, 2011. Defendant has not filed its response and it is long overdue. The Court orders Defendant to file its response to Plaintiff's motion by close of business on March 4, 2011. The Court will interpret the failure to respond as Defendant's non-opposition to the motion. v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants. / DALE CHUNG, Plaintiff, No. CV 10-1099 PJH (NJV) ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO FILE ITS RESPONSE TO MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS (Docket No. 21) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION

Dockets.Justia.com